IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1184-d729753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Ecological Support and Physical Facilities Satisfaction: How They Link to Social Participation and Well-Being among Urban Residents in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Mahzan Awang

    (Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Alfitri Alfitri

    (Faculty of Social and Political Science, University of Sriwijaya, Palembang 30862, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia)

  • Abdul Razaq Ahmad

    (Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Jalal Deen Careemdeen

    (Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Juhari Ahmad

    (Office of the Executive Director, The Selangor Housing and Property Board, Shah Alam 40503, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

In urban communities, the threat to residents’ social well-being arises from their social lives; however, there is little evidence demonstrating how urban communities are connected with each other to improve their well-being. Therefore, the current study aims to identify the satisfaction levels with socio-ecological support and facilities received by selected urban residents in Malaysia. The study also examines the link between residents’ satisfaction and their social participation, as well as social well-being. This survey used a set of closed-ended questionnaires. A simple random sampling technique was employed, where a total number of 2502 respondents from six zones participated in this study. The collected data were analysed descriptively and inferentially. The results revealed that the majority of respondents are satisfied with socio-ecological and physical green facilities. Better green infrastructure management practice is required because the results from this study identified scientific issues in green environments in urban recreational centres, waste management, regular health maintenance, landscaping, and building maintenance. Results showed significant differences in the residents’ social well-being based on their socio-economic backgrounds. Results also demonstrated that social participation has significantly contributed to the social well-being of urban residents. These findings indicate the importance of various socio-ecological programmes to ensure a positive impact on the social well-being of the urban community. Overall, this study suggests implementing a comprehensive support mechanism for socio-ecological support initiatives to improve the social well-being of urban residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Mahzan Awang & Alfitri Alfitri & Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Jalal Deen Careemdeen & Juhari Ahmad, 2022. "Socio-Ecological Support and Physical Facilities Satisfaction: How They Link to Social Participation and Well-Being among Urban Residents in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1184-:d:729753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Mahzan Awang & Abdul Talib Mohamed Hashim & Tan Kim Hua & Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Nordin Mamat, 2022. "Observations of Strategies Used by Secondary School Teachers in Physical Classrooms to Promote Positive Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Zhichang Cai & ChengHe Guan & An Trinh & Bo Zhang & Zhibin Chen & Sumeeta Srinivasan & Chris Nielsen, 2022. "Satisfactions on Self-Perceived Health of Urban Residents in Chengdu, China: Gender, Age and the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1184-:d:729753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.