IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1073-d727358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Utilization of Selected Threatened or Protected Plant Species; A Case of Limpopo Province, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Marula Rasethe

    (Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa)

  • Martin Potgieter

    (Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa)

  • Michèle Pfab

    (Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring, South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Private Bag X101, Silverton 0184, South Africa)

Abstract

In Limpopo Province, harvesting plants for herbal use by traditional health practitioners and ordinary people is an everyday practice. The study investigated the utilization of the following Threatened or Protected Plant-listed species (TOPS): Alepidea amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh., Brackenridgea zanguebarica Oliv., Dioscorea sylvatica Eckl., Drimia sanguinea (Schinz) Jessop, Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B.L.Burtt and Warburgia salutaris (G.Bertol.) Chiov. in Limpopo Province, South Africa. A total of 333 participants were interviewed in this study, across the five districts of the Limpopo Province. Results indicate that traditional health practitioners (THPs) and community members (CMs) use these species exclusively for medicinal purposes. Remedies were often prepared using the underground parts of the plants, which were purchased chiefly from muthi shops–shops trading in both indigenous and exotic plant and animal material used for witchcraft and/or healing. Just over 58.4% of respondents indicated that they purchase material from muthi shops due to their scarcity in local communal lands. In contrast, nearly 40% of participants disclosed that they harvest material from open access land. Only 1.6% of participants sourced these plants from their home gardens. The preference for underground parts and species rarely cultivated in home gardens will lead to extinction of wild populations unless users switch to alternative parts for sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Marula Rasethe & Martin Potgieter & Michèle Pfab, 2022. "The Utilization of Selected Threatened or Protected Plant Species; A Case of Limpopo Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1073-:d:727358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1073/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1073/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1073-:d:727358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.