IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1059-d727145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Investigations into Environment-Friendly Production Methods for Railway Prestressed Concrete Sleepers and Bearers

Author

Listed:
  • Ruilin You

    (Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Jijun Wang

    (Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Sakdirat Kaewunruen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Meng Wang

    (Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Na Ning

    (Railway Engineering Research Institution, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Prestressed concrete sleeper is a safety-critical track component widely used in ballasted railway tracks. The performance, endurance and quality of prestressed concrete sleepers can detrimentally affect the serviceability and durability of a railway track. An optimal production method is an important criterion underpinning quality and durability over the entire service life of prestressed concrete sleepers. At present, the research work of the sleeper mainly focuses on the dynamic load, bearing capacity and structural design method, etc. However, there exists a lack of research on the specific advantages and disadvantages of the sleeper production process and the improvement of the sleeper process research. This study is the world’s first to collect and analyse the technical data and characteristics of modern production methods of prestressed concrete sleepers, including the long-line system method, pre-tensioned long-mould flow method, pre-tensioned short-mould flow method, post-tensioned short-mould flow method and instant-demoulded short-mould flow method. The precautions for these prestressed concrete sleepers are highlighted in the paper as well. The research results show that the long-line system method, pre-tensioned short-mould flow method, post-tensioned short-mould flow method and instant-demoulded short-mould flow method have a higher automation level and lower efficiency than the pre-tensioned long-mould flow method. The production method of the pre-tensioned long-mould flow method has high efficiency and low cost of equipment, but more workers are needed. Through a comparative analysis, this paper also determines the environmental impacts and provide new references and suggestions for the development and progress of sleeper production technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruilin You & Jijun Wang & Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Meng Wang & Na Ning, 2022. "Comparative Investigations into Environment-Friendly Production Methods for Railway Prestressed Concrete Sleepers and Bearers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1059-:d:727145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1059-:d:727145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.