IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p923-d724761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island

Author

Listed:
  • Minxian Luo

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Lifang Xiao

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Xuhui Chen

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Kaiqin Lin

    (Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone Natural Resources and Ecological Environment Bureau, Fuzhou 350400, China)

  • Bao Liu

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Zongming He

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Jinfu Liu

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Shiqun Zheng

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

Pingtan Island is the largest island in Fujian Province and the fifth largest island in China. The invasion of a large number of alien plants has had a profound impact on the local ecological environment. Because the harm caused by alien invasive plants varies greatly between different ecosystems and even in different habitats, the risk assessment index system suitable for one region may not be suitable for other regions. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a risk assessment index system for invasive alien plants on Pingtan Island. Alien plant communities in different habitats were studied by means of quadrat investigation and professional literature review. Some invasive alien species were selected and compiled into a list of invasive alien plants on Pingtan Island, and their species composition, origin, flora, life forms, and habitats were statistically grouped. There were 104 species in 80 genera and 37 families of alien invasive plants. Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Amaranthaceae, and Poaceae were the main families, accounting for 26.7%, 6.7%, 6.7% and 5.8% of the total species, respectively. The geographical components of families and genera have obvious tropical properties, accounting for 51.3% and 66.6% of the total species, respectively. These originated mainly from South America and North America, accounting for 45.5% and 30.1% of the total frequency, respectively. Annual herbs, biennial herbs, and perennial herbs accounted for 84.6% of the total species. Based on a DPSIR conceptual model and an AHP method, an invasion risk assessment of 104 invasive alien plants was conducted. The ecological adaptability, habitat distribution and landscape impact of species were considered in the selection of indicators and the formulation of standards. A total of 23 high-risk invasive species were identified at level I, 37 medium-risk invasive species at level II, and 44 low-risk invasive species at level III. Lantana camara L. had the highest risk score (49), followed by Cenchrus echinatus L. (45), Spartina alterniflora Loisel. (45), and Panicum repens L. (43.5). Suggestions are put forward to prevent the invasion of alien plants on Pingtan Island and to provide a theoretical basis for promoting the healthy and stable development of the ecological environment on the island.

Suggested Citation

  • Minxian Luo & Lifang Xiao & Xuhui Chen & Kaiqin Lin & Bao Liu & Zongming He & Jinfu Liu & Shiqun Zheng, 2022. "Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:923-:d:724761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaole Wen & Yanli Ming & Yonggang Gao & Xinyu Hu, 2019. "Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis of Ecological Quality of Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone, a New Type of Sea Island City, Based on RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Weiheng Zheng & Feng Cai & Shenliang Chen & Jun Zhu & Hongshuai Qi & Shaohua Zhao & Jianhui Liu, 2020. "Ecological Suitability of Island Development Based on Ecosystem Services Value, Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Pingtan Island, Fujian, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yugang He, 2022. "Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Policy: Do They Matter for Environmental Sustainability?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Xu Bi & Bianrong Chang & Fen Hou & Zihan Yang & Qi Fu & Bo Li, 2021. "Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Ling Xiao & Li Cui & Qun’ou Jiang & Meilin Wang & Lidan Xu & Haiming Yan, 2020. "Spatial Structure of a Potential Ecological Network in Nanping, China, Based on Ecosystem Service Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Xueman Zuo & Jiazheng Li & Ludan Zhang & Zhilong Wu & Sen Lin & Xisheng Hu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Variations in Ecological Quality and Its Response to Topography and Road Network Based on GEE: Taking the Minjiang River Basin as a Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Yanru Wang & Xiaojuan Zhang & Peihao Peng, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Changes of Land-Use/Land Cover Change and the Effects on Ecosystem Service Values in Derong County, China, from 1992–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. María Andreína Moros-Ochoa & Gilmer Yovani Castro-Nieto & Anderson Quintero-Español & Carolina Llorente-Portillo, 2022. "Forecasting Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint at a Worldwide Level to 2030 Using Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Meng Luo & Shengwei Zhang & Lei Huang & Zhiqiang Liu & Lin Yang & Ruishen Li & Xi Lin, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Environment Quality Based on RSEI: A Case Study in Ulan Mulun River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Jianbo Zhou & Wanqing Liu, 2022. "Monitoring and Evaluation of Eco-Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing-Based Ecological Index (RSEI) in Taihu Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    10. Shangxiao Wang & Ming Zhang & Xi Xi, 2022. "Ecological Environment Evaluation Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index: A Case Study in East China over the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Jinzhu Gao & Taitian An & Hongfen Zhang & Kuncheng Zhang & Jiawen Shen & Guangshun He & Xiao Yang & Rui Zhao & Shizheng Tian, 2023. "The Evaluation Method of the Marine Spatial Suitability for Islands from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Case Study of the Pingtan Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Songlin Zhou & Wei Li & Wei Zhang & Ziyuan Wang, 2023. "The Assessment of the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Eco-Environmental Quality in the Chishui River Basin from 2000 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:923-:d:724761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.