IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14777-d967815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Study on Seismic Performance Evaluation of Multi-Ply Bellows Type Expansion Joint for Piping Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bub-Gyu Jeon

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Sung-Wan Kim

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Da-Woon Yun

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Bu-Seog Ju

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea)

  • Ho-Young Son

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea)

Abstract

Piping systems are a representative social infrastructure to provide oil, gas, and water. Damage to piping systems may cause serious consequences, such as fire, water outage, and environmental pollution. Therefore, piping systems need to be protected from natural disasters, such as earthquakes. Earthquakes may cause deformation that exceeds piping design criteria. For example, large relative displacements and liquefaction of the ground resulting in loss of strength and ground subsidence, and the side-sway of primary structures subjected to a strong ground motion may cause critical damage to piping systems. Therefore, expansion joints to maintain flexibility can be applied to locations where excessive deformation is expected to improve the seismic performance of piping systems. Metal bellows, a type of expansion joints, are flexible, so they are highly durable against deformation and fatigue loads. This indicates that metal bellows can be used as seismic separation joints for piping. In this study, experimental research was conducted to analyze the seismic performance of multi-ply bellows type expansion joints, a type of metal bellows. Monotonic loading tests and cyclic loading tests were conducted on 2-ply bellows and 3-ply bellows, and the results were compared. In the cyclic loading tests, multi-step increasing amplitude cyclic loading, which used the displacement history amplified in stages, and constant amplitude cycling loading with various magnitudes were considered. The test results showed no significant difference in bending performance for monotonic loading between the two types of multi-ply bellows. The 3-ply bellows, however, showed higher performance for low-cycle fatigue than 2-ply bellows.

Suggested Citation

  • Bub-Gyu Jeon & Sung-Wan Kim & Da-Woon Yun & Bu-Seog Ju & Ho-Young Son, 2022. "An Experimental Study on Seismic Performance Evaluation of Multi-Ply Bellows Type Expansion Joint for Piping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14777-:d:967815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14777/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14777/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bub-Gyu Jeon & Sung-Wan Kim & Da-Woon Yun & Daegi Hahm & Seunghyun Eem, 2022. "Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Main Steam Piping of Isolated APR1400 NPP Considering the Actual Failure Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14777-:d:967815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.