IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14309-d960723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution under a Climate Change Scenario: Methodology and Case Study Application

Author

Listed:
  • Sílvia Coelho

    (CESAM & Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Joana Ferreira

    (CESAM & Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • David Carvalho

    (CESAM & Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Myriam Lopes

    (CESAM & Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

The World Health Organization estimates that every year air pollution kills seven million people worldwide. As it is expected that climate change will affect future air quality patterns, the full understanding of the links between air pollution and climate change, and how they affect human health, are challenges for future research. In this scope, a methodology to assess the air quality impacts on health was developed. The WRF-CAMx modelling framework was applied for the medium-term future climate (considering the SSP2-4.5 scenario) and for the recent past (considered as baseline). Following the WHO recommendations, mortality health indicators were used to estimate the health impacts of long-term exposures. For that, the Aveiro Region, in Portugal, was considered as a case study. Future climate results indicate the occurrence of higher temperatures, and lower total precipitation. Despite that, improvements in the main pollutants’ concentrations, and consequently in the reduction of the related premature deaths are foreseen, mainly due to the reduction of pollutants emissions imposed by the European legislation for the upcoming years. The applied approach constitutes an added value in this research field, being crucial to anticipate the effects of climate change on air quality and evaluate their impacts on human health.

Suggested Citation

  • Sílvia Coelho & Joana Ferreira & David Carvalho & Myriam Lopes, 2022. "Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution under a Climate Change Scenario: Methodology and Case Study Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14309-:d:960723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yunfang Jiang & Luyao Hou & Tiemao Shi & Qinchang Gui, 2017. "A Review of Urban Planning Research for Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeong-Min Son & Jeong-Hee Eum & Dong-Pil Kim & Jino Kwon, 2018. "Management Strategies of Thermal Environment in Urban Area Using the Cooling Function of the Mountains: A Case Study of the Honam Jeongmaek Areas in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Darryn McEvoy, 2019. "Climate Resilient Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-4, January.
    3. Yingling Shi & Xinping Liu, 2019. "Research on the Literature of Green Building Based on the Web of Science: A Scientometric Analysis in CiteSpace (2002–2018)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Anthony McCosker & Anne Matan & Dora Marinova, 2018. "Policies, Politics, and Paradigms: Healthy Planning in Australian Local Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Ronchi, Silvia & Pontarollo, Nicola & Serpieri, Carolina, 2021. "Clustering the built form at LAU2 level for addressing sustainable policies: Insights from the Belgium case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Hui Yang & Xuexin Shao & Ming Wu, 2019. "A Review on Ecosystem Health Research: A Visualization Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Guohua Qu & Yue Zhang & Kaichao Tan & Jiangtao Han & Weihua Qu, 2022. "Exploring Knowledge Domain and Emerging Trends in Climate Change and Environmental Audit: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Andresa Ledo Marques & Angélica Tanus Benatti Alvim & Jörg Schröder, 2022. "Ecosystem Services and Urban Planning: A Review of the Contribution of the Concept to Adaptation in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14309-:d:960723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.