IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13977-d954932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Faculty Performance? Evidence from an Accelerated Research University in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Yu

    (Center for Higher Education Research, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Yue Yan

    (Business School of Zhangjiagang Campus, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 215600, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Mingjun Li

    (Institute of Public Policy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

Abstract

The current trend of building accelerated research universities in China that explore the pursuit of interdisciplinary research (IDR) approach to yield academic excellence and innovation through institutional reforms is aspiring to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Employing data from faculty Curriculum Vitae and bibliometric records from a pilot accelerated research university in China, this study provides a case study to empirically quantify the impact of interdisciplinary research on 490 faculty’s performance, including research productivity, impact, and prestige. Results show that faculty involved in interdisciplinary research outperform their non-interdisciplinary counterparts in terms of research productivity, impact, and prestige. The degree of interdisciplinary as measured by subject categories is positively associated with faculty research performance. However, there are heterogeneous effects across faculty subgroups since faculty in applied-oriented disciplines reap more benefits while young faculty may suffer. Additionally, this study finds that faculty individual interdisciplinary research behavior can be affected by school-level concentration and dispersion of the degree of interdisciplinarity, which suggests the existence of peer effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Yu & Yue Yan & Mingjun Li, 2022. "Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Faculty Performance? Evidence from an Accelerated Research University in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13977-:d:954932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13977-:d:954932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.