IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p569-d718216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The RothC Model to Complement Life Cycle Analyses: A Case Study of an Italian Olive Grove

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Fantin

    (ENEA—Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Laboratory for Valorisation of Resources in Productive and Territorial Systems (SSPT-USER-RISE), Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna, Italy)

  • Alessandro Buscaroli

    (Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences Department (BiGeA), Campus di Ravenna, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Via S. Alberto, 16, 48123 Ravenna, Italy
    Inter-Departmental Centre for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRSA), Alma Mater Studiorum—Università Bologna, Via S. Alberto 163, 48123 Ravenna, Italy)

  • Patrizia Buttol

    (ENEA—Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Laboratory for Valorisation of Resources in Productive and Territorial Systems (SSPT-USER-RISE), Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna, Italy)

  • Elisa Novelli

    (Oleificio Zucchi Spa, Via Acquaviva 12, 26100 Cremona, Italy)

  • Cristian Soldati

    (Inter-Departmental Centre for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRSA), Alma Mater Studiorum—Università Bologna, Via S. Alberto 163, 48123 Ravenna, Italy)

  • Denis Zannoni

    (Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences Department (BiGeA), Campus di Ravenna, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Via S. Alberto, 16, 48123 Ravenna, Italy
    Inter-Departmental Centre for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRSA), Alma Mater Studiorum—Università Bologna, Via S. Alberto 163, 48123 Ravenna, Italy)

  • Giovanni Zucchi

    (Oleificio Zucchi Spa, Via Acquaviva 12, 26100 Cremona, Italy)

  • Serena Righi

    (Inter-Departmental Centre for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRSA), Alma Mater Studiorum—Università Bologna, Via S. Alberto 163, 48123 Ravenna, Italy
    Physics and Astronomy Department (DIFA), Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a fundamental role in soil health, and its storage in soil is an important element to mitigate climate change. How to include this factor in Life Cycle Assessment studies has been the object of several papers and is still under discussion. SOC storage has been proposed as an additional environmental information in some applications of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF). In the framework of wider activity aimed at producing the PEF of olive oil, the RothC model was applied to an olive cultivation located in Lazio region (Italy) to calculate the SOC storage and assess four scenarios representing different agricultural practices. RothC applicability, possible use of its results for improving product environmental performance, and relevance of SOC storage in terms of CO 2eq compared to greenhouse gas emissions of the life-cycle of olive oil are discussed in this paper. According to the results, in all scenarios, the contribution in terms of CO 2eq associated with SOC storage is remarkable compared to the total greenhouse gas emissions of the olive oil life-cycle. It is the opinion of the authors that the calculation of the SOC balance allows a more proper evaluation of the agricultural products contribution to climate change, and that the indications of the scenarios analysis are useful to enhance the environmental performance of these products. The downside is that the application of RothC requires additional data collection and expertise if compared to the execution of PEF studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Fantin & Alessandro Buscaroli & Patrizia Buttol & Elisa Novelli & Cristian Soldati & Denis Zannoni & Giovanni Zucchi & Serena Righi, 2022. "The RothC Model to Complement Life Cycle Analyses: A Case Study of an Italian Olive Grove," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:569-:d:718216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:569-:d:718216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.