IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12909-d937844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of DEM Models with Different Elemental Dimensions for TBM Disc Cutter Rock Fragmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Xu

    (Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China
    State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yujie Zhu

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Danqing Song

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xiaogang Guo

    (Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Xiaoli Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Enzhi Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Runhu Lu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

Abstract

Disc cutters are the dominant tool used in the excavation of hard rock formations in any underground construction application, such as when tunneling using tunnel-boring machines (TBM), as well as in shaft- and raise boring operations. Optimization of the cutting geometry of a given disc cutter for application in a rock formation often involves full-scale cutting tests, which is a difficult and costly proposition. An alternative to full-scale testing is the numerical simulation of TBM disc cutters for optimization under different settings. Recent efforts in the field of numerical simulations of rock cutting have shown the relative success of discrete element models, such as particle flow code (PFC), to simulate two- and three-dimensional rock fragmentation. This study is focused on a sensitivity analysis of PFC simulation of rock-cutting relative to the size of the elements. The calculated cutting forces were compared with the recorded forces under various conditions during full-scale tests using a linear cutting machine (LCM) on Colorado red granite (CRG). The estimated cutting coefficient and specific energy in the LCM tests and simulations showed good correlations, which validates the numerical simulation results. Two- and three-dimensional models showed that two-dimensional numerical models can offer a qualitative assessment of crack development, whereas three-dimensional models could be used to estimate the specific energy when cutting. The results can help in predicting the cutting forces in different rocks and ultimately improving disc-cutter geometry and cutter-head design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Xu & Yujie Zhu & Danqing Song & Xiaogang Guo & Xiaoli Liu & Enzhi Wang & Runhu Lu, 2022. "Comparison of DEM Models with Different Elemental Dimensions for TBM Disc Cutter Rock Fragmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12909-:d:937844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12909/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12909/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12909-:d:937844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.