IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12900-d937654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Responses of Different Types of High-Speed Railway Noise Barriers under the Influence of Fluctuating Wind Pressure

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoping Wu

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Centre for Transportation Studies, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

  • Xuanyi He

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Jie Huang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

The fluctuating wind pressure generated when a high-speed train passes through the noise barrier will cause deformation and damage to the noise barrier, affecting the safety of train operation and causing serious economic losses. In this paper, a research method for the dynamic response of noise barriers is proposed, and a comparative study of vertical noise barriers and semi-enclosed noise barriers is carried out. The study shows that when trains pass through the noise barrier, the fluctuating wind pressure on the surface of the two different types of noise barriers both exhibit the characteristics of head and tail waves; the time course curve of fluctuating wind pressure has the same change rule, the wind pressure reaches the maximum value at the bottom measuring point, the maximum value of fluctuating wind positive pressure and negative pressure of the semi-closed noise barrier is larger than that of the vertical noise barrier. In terms of natural frequency, the natural frequency range of the vertical noise barrier is 16~85 Hz, and the natural frequency range of the semi-enclosed noise barrier is 3~13 Hz. The natural frequency of the semi-enclosed noise barrier partially coincides with the main frequency of fluctuating wind pressure, which may lead to resonance damage. When the train speed is raised from 200 km/h to 350 km/h, the maximum equivalent force of the semi-enclosed noise barrier reaches 17.21 Mpa, which is much larger than the maximum equivalent force of the vertical noise barrier. At the same time, the displacement of the two noise barriers increases with the height of the noise barrier, and the maximum displacement of the semi-closed noise barrier unit board reaches 3.63 mm, which is much larger than that of the vertical noise barrier unit board.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoping Wu & Xuanyi He & Jie Huang, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Responses of Different Types of High-Speed Railway Noise Barriers under the Influence of Fluctuating Wind Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12900-:d:937654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12900/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12900/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12900-:d:937654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.