IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12271-d926964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CFD-Based Fire Risk Assessment and Control at the Historic Dong Wind and Rain Bridges in the Western Hunan Region: The Case of Huilong Bridge

Author

Listed:
  • Fupeng Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Health Building Research Center, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Lei Shi

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Health Building Research Center, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Simian Liu

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Health Building Research Center, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Jiaqi Shi

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Health Building Research Center, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    College of Architecture, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China)

  • Cong Shi

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Health Building Research Center, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Tansheng Xiang

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Health Building Research Center, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

The Dong wind and rain bridges in western Hunan are among the most extraordinary historical buildings that express the unique culture of the Dong people, and are an unparalleled display of history, culture, aesthetics and architectural skills, but they are exposed to various disasters. However, fire poses a serious challenge to historical wind and rain bridges. This study investigated the fire risk of wind and rain bridges in terms of building materials, structural forms, fire habits, and fire loads. Fire dynamics simulator software and SketchUp modeling software were used to visualize and numerically simulate fire conditions. The survey results indicated that the fire load of the Huilong bridge was 1,794,561 MJ. After a fire, the central pavilion underwent a flashover at 200 s. By 600 s, the maximum temperature of the bridge was 1200 °C, and the entire bridge was in flashover condition. Furthermore, targeted fire-mitigation strategies were proposed according to the architectural characteristics and cultural environment of the wind and rain bridges in terms of the following four components: automatic fire-extinguishing equipment, fireproof coatings, suspended ceiling, and skylights. The effectiveness of the fire-resistance performance of the strategies was also evaluated. The fireproof coating measures were the most effective, and the bridge sections delayed reaching the flashover state by 40–80 s. The reported results can help reduce the fire-related risks of wind and rain bridges and protect our historical heritage more effectively and efficiently. Furthermore, this study can serve as a reference for other historic wooden structures to develop appropriate mitigation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fupeng Zhang & Lei Shi & Simian Liu & Jiaqi Shi & Cong Shi & Tansheng Xiang, 2022. "CFD-Based Fire Risk Assessment and Control at the Historic Dong Wind and Rain Bridges in the Western Hunan Region: The Case of Huilong Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12271-:d:926964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Hsiang Huang, 2020. "The Use of Parallel Computing to Accelerate Fire Simulations for Cultural Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Tarek Zayed & Ashutosh Bagchi, 2020. "A Sustainability Based Framework for Evaluating the Heritage Buildings," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 49-73, April.
    3. Fupeng Zhang & Lei Shi & Simian Liu & Jiaqi Shi & Qian Ma & Jinyue Zhang, 2022. "Climate Adaptability Based on Indoor Physical Environment of Traditional Dwelling in North Dong Areas, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sisi Xia & Bomin Liu & Haobing Wang, 2024. "Building Categorization Strategy Guidance in the Historic Area Renovation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Farzaneh Karimi & Nima Valibeig & Gholamhossein Memarian & Aliakbar Kamari, 2022. "Sustainability Rating Systems for Historic Buildings: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Sherif Mahmoud & Ashutosh Bagchi, 2021. "Studying Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort Conditions in Heritage Buildings: A Case Study of Murabba Palace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Zhou Li & Jiahui Diao & Shaoming Lu & Cong Tao & Jonathan Krauth, 2022. "Exploring a Sustainable Approach to Vernacular Dwelling Spaces with a Multiple Evidence Base Method: A Case Study of the Bai People’s Courtyard Houses in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Fupeng Zhang & Lei Shi & Simian Liu & Jiaqi Shi & Yong Yu, 2022. "Sustainable Renovation and Assessment of Existing Aging Rammed Earth Dwellings in Hunan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Daniel Sampaio Tavares & Fernando Brandão Alves & Isabel Breda Vásquez, 2021. "The Relationship between Intangible Cultural Heritage and Urban Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12271-:d:926964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.