IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12113-d924567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Discrete Form of Hoek–Brown Criterion and Its Application to Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Rock Slope Stability

Author

Listed:
  • Youn-Kyou Lee

    (Department of Coastal Construction Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan 54150, Korea)

  • S. Pietruszczak

    (Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada)

Abstract

The generalized Hoek–Brown criterion (GHB) is recognized as one of the standard failure criteria in rock engineering and its validity extends to a wide range of rock mass quality. A drawback of this criterion is the difficulty of transforming it into an explicit form defining the Mohr failure envelope when its strength parameter a is not equal to 0.5. The information on the functional form of the Mohr envelope for the full range of rock mass conditions enables the implementation of classical engineering approaches, such as the limit equilibrium method and limit analysis, in the framework of the GHB criterion. Knowing that for a ≠ 0.5 the exact closed-form representation of the Mohr envelope is not feasible, an alternative is to express it in an approximate analytical form. The main purpose of this study is to propose a new improved method to define an approximate Mohr envelope of the GHB criterion that is much more accurate compared with the recently published approximations. The idea behind the formulation is to expand the Balmer’s equation, which defines the relationship between the normal stress and minor principal stress at failure, by invoking the finite Taylor series centered at the known solution for a = 0.5 . The formulation is then completed by substituting this solution into another Balmer’s equation, defining the relationship between the shear strength and the minor principal stress. The Taylor polynomial approximations of up to third degree are considered in the formulation. The accuracy of the shear strength prediction is shown to be much better than that of the approximate formula of Lee and Pietruszczak proposed in 2021. An illustrative example of limit equilibrium analysis of rock slope stability, incorporating the new approximate expression for the Mohr envelope, is provided. The analysis incorporates a modified version of the Bishop approach, which is simpler and more rigorous than the original nonlinear expression. The study confirms that the new approximate representation of the Mohr failure envelope can facilitate the application of the GHB criterion to a range of practical rock engineering calculations.

Suggested Citation

  • Youn-Kyou Lee & S. Pietruszczak, 2022. "A New Discrete Form of Hoek–Brown Criterion and Its Application to Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Rock Slope Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12113-:d:924567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12113-:d:924567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.