IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11944-d921670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Liquefaction Prediction Based on Bayesian Optimization and Support Vector Machines

Author

Listed:
  • Xuesong Zhang

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Biao He

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Mohanad Muayad Sabri Sabri

    (Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Mohammed Al-Bahrani

    (Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Techniques Engineering Department, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Babylon 51001, Iraq)

  • Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh

    (Department of Urban Planning, Engineering Networks and Systems, Institute of Architecture and Construction, South Ural State University, 76 Lenin Prospect, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

Abstract

Liquefaction has been responsible for several earthquake-related hazards in the past. An earthquake may cause liquefaction in saturated granular soils, which might lead to massive consequences. The ability to accurately anticipate soil liquefaction potential is thus critical, particularly in the context of civil engineering project planning. Support vector machines (SVMs) and Bayesian optimization (BO), a well-known optimization method, were used in this work to accurately forecast soil liquefaction potential. Before the development of the BOSVM model, an evolutionary random forest (ERF) model was used for input selection. From among the nine candidate inputs, the ERF selected six, including water table, effective vertical stress, peak acceleration at the ground surface, measured CPT tip resistance, cyclic stress ratio (CSR), and mean grain size, as the most important ones to predict the soil liquefaction. After the BOSVM model was developed using the six selected inputs, the performance of this model was evaluated using renowned performance criteria, including accuracy (%), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). In addition, the performance of this model was compared with a standard SVM model and other machine learning models. The results of the BOSVM model showed that this model outperformed other models. The BOSVM model achieved an accuracy of 96.4% and 95.8% and an AUC of 0.93 and 0.98 for the training and testing phases, respectively. Our research suggests that BOSVM is a viable alternative to conventional soil liquefaction prediction methods. In addition, the findings of this research show that the BO method is successful in training the SVM model.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuesong Zhang & Biao He & Mohanad Muayad Sabri Sabri & Mohammed Al-Bahrani & Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh, 2022. "Soil Liquefaction Prediction Based on Bayesian Optimization and Support Vector Machines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11944-:d:921670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Huang & Miao Yu, 2013. "Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 2375-2384, February.
    2. Yu Huang & Ximiao Jiang, 2010. "Field-observed phenomena of seismic liquefaction and subsidence during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 54(3), pages 839-850, September.
    3. Xinhua Xue & Xingguo Yang, 2013. "Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of soil liquefaction," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 901-917, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaohua Ding & Mehdi Jamei & Mahdi Hasanipanah & Rini Asnida Abdullah & Binh Nguyen Le, 2023. "Optimized Data-Driven Models for Prediction of Flyrock due to Blasting in Surface Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao-Hua Bao & Guan-Lin Ye & Bin Ye, 2014. "Explanation of liquefaction in after shock of the 2011 great east Japan earthquake using numerical analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1881-1897, December.
    2. Domenico Lombardi & Subhamoy Bhattacharya, 2014. "Liquefaction of soil in the Emilia-Romagna region after the 2012 Northern Italy earthquake sequence," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1749-1770, September.
    3. Yu Huang & Zhuoqiang Wen, 2015. "Recent developments of soil improvement methods for seismic liquefaction mitigation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1927-1938, April.
    4. Xiaohua Bao & Bin Ye & Guanlin Ye & Feng Zhang, 2016. "Co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of a wall type breakwater on a natural ground composed of liquefiable layer," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(3), pages 1799-1819, September.
    5. Yu Huang & Liuyuan Zhao, 2018. "The effects of small particles on soil seismic liquefaction resistance: current findings and future challenges," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 567-579, May.
    6. Xiwen Zhang & Xiaowei Tang & Ryosuke Uzuoka, 2015. "Numerical simulation of 3D liquefaction disasters using an automatic time stepping method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1275-1287, June.
    7. Yong-gang Zhang & Junbo Qiu & Yan Zhang & Yongyao Wei, 2021. "The adoption of ELM to the prediction of soil liquefaction based on CPT," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 539-549, May.
    8. Prince Poddar & Sauhardra Ojha & Mohit Kumar Gupta, 2023. "Probabilistic and deterministic-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment of layered soil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 993-1012, September.
    9. Miguel Jaimes & Mauro Niño & Eduardo Reinoso, 2015. "Regional map of earthquake-induced liquefaction hazard using the lateral spreading displacement index D LL," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(3), pages 1595-1618, July.
    10. Karen E Engel, 2016. "Talcahuano, Chile, in the wake of the 2010 disaster: A vulnerable middle?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1057-1081, January.
    11. Filippo Santucci de Magistris & Giovanni Lanzano & Giovanni Forte & Giovanni Fabbrocino, 2014. "A peak acceleration threshold for soil liquefaction: lessons learned from the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 1069-1094, November.
    12. Huafeng Xu & Bin Liu & Zhigeng Fang, 2014. "New grey prediction model and its application in forecasting land subsidence in coal mine," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(2), pages 1181-1194, March.
    13. V. Kohestani & M. Hassanlourad & A. Ardakani, 2015. "Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1079-1089, November.
    14. Edris Alam & Dale Dominey-Howes, 2014. "An analysis of the AD1762 earthquake and tsunami in SE Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 903-933, January.
    15. Koki Nakao & Shinya Inazumi & Tsuyoshi Takahashi & Supakij Nontananandh, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of the Liquefaction Phenomenon by MPSM-DEM Coupled CAES," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Ye-Shuang Xu & Run-Qiu Huang & Jie Han & Shui-Long Shen, 2013. "Evaluation of allowable withdrawn volume of groundwater based on observed data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 513-522, June.
    17. Yu Huang & Weijie Zhang & Zili Dai & Qiang Xu, 2013. "Numerical simulation of flow processes in liquefied soils using a soil–water-coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 809-827, October.
    18. Yu Huang & Miao Yu, 2013. "Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 2375-2384, February.
    19. Karen E Engel, 2016. "Talcahuano, Chile, in the wake of the 2010 disaster: A vulnerable middle?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1057-1081, January.
    20. Yu Huang & Hu Zheng & Zhijing Zhuang, 2012. "Seismic liquefaction analysis of a reservoir dam foundation in the South–North Water Diversion project in China. Part I: Liquefaction potential assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(3), pages 1299-1311, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11944-:d:921670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.