Author
Listed:
- Chiara Suanno
(Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Silvia Sandrini
(National Research Council of Italy-Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Iris Aloisi
(Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy)
- Paola De Nuntiis
(National Research Council of Italy-Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy)
- Maria Cristina Facchini
(National Research Council of Italy-Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy)
- Stefano Del Duca
(Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Interdepartmental Centre for Agri-Food Industrial Research, University of Bologna, Via Quinto Bucci 336, 47521 Cesena, Italy)
- Delia Fernández-González
(National Research Council of Italy-Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
Department Biodiversity and Environmental Management, University of Léon, Campus Vegazana, S/n, 24007 Léon, Spain)
Abstract
Nowadays, there is a wide range of different methods available for the monitoring of pollen and allergens, but their relative efficiency is sometimes unclear, as conventional pollen monitoring does not thoroughly describe pollen allergenicity. This study aims to evaluate airborne pollen, allergen, and protein levels, associating them with meteorological and chemical parameters. The sampling was performed in Bologna (Italy) during the grass flowering period, with three different devices: a Cyclone sampler (CS), a Dicothomous sampler (DS), and a Berner impactor (BI). Total proteins were extracted from aerosol samples, and grass allergens Phl p 1 and Phl p 5 were quantified by ELISA. Airborne Poaceae pollen concentrations were also evaluated, using a Hirst-type trap. Proteins and allergens collected by CS resulted about ten times higher than those collected by the other two instruments, possibly due to their different cut-offs, while DS and BI results appeared consistent only for the total proteins collected in the fine fraction (1.3 vs. 1.6 μg/m 3 ). Airborne proteins correlated neither with Poaceae pollen nor with its aeroallergens, while aeroallergens correlated with pollen only in the coarse particulate, indicating the presence of pollen-independent aeroallergens in the fine particulate, promoted by high wind speed.
Suggested Citation
Chiara Suanno & Silvia Sandrini & Iris Aloisi & Paola De Nuntiis & Maria Cristina Facchini & Stefano Del Duca & Delia Fernández-González, 2022.
"Airborne Pollen, Allergens, and Proteins: A Comparative Study of Three Sampling Methods,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11825-:d:919753
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11825-:d:919753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.