IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11684-d917551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will Wind–Sand Activity Bury the Opencut Tunnel along the Linhe–Ceke Railway, China?

Author

Listed:
  • Min Yan

    (Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 29 Erdos East Street, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Hejun Zuo

    (Key Laboratory of Aeolian Physics and Desertification Control Engineering from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 29 Erdos East Street, Hohhot 010018, China)

Abstract

The opencut tunnel is a kind of linear arch construction and a new linear sand-prevention structure. In order to clarify the wind-proof mechanism of the opencut tunnel, this paper seeks to answer the question of whether the opencut tunnel of the Lin–Ce railway will be buried. In this paper, a wind tunnel experiment combined with field investigation and testing is used to systematically study the mechanism of wind and sand resistance in an opencut tunnel, and it is verified whether the sand burial of the opencut tunnel is possible. The results show that the airflow greater than 0.7 times of the height is in a state of acceleration and uplift, and no sand-filling phenomenon occurs at the ventilation vent at the top of the opencut tunnel. More than 85% of the sediment transport on the windward side was within the height of 0–10 cm, and 80% on the leeward side was concentrated in the height of 30–70 cm; the greater the angle between the opencut tunnel and the wind direction, the higher the potential of wind and sand resistance. In the past 20 years, no mass accumulation of shifting sand occurred along the opencut tunnel. Furthermore, the shifting sand could not bury the opencut tunnel in the small-scale time range. Wind-field characteristics determine angle between the opencut tunnel and wind direction as 75°−90°, setting the optimal scope of protection. However, different angles can effectively prevent and control sand flow hazards in railways, ensuring smooth railway operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Yan & Hejun Zuo, 2022. "Will Wind–Sand Activity Bury the Opencut Tunnel along the Linhe–Ceke Railway, China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11684-:d:917551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11684-:d:917551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.