IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11368-d911686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Hilly Areas Based on SPCA and MCR: A Case Study of Nanchong City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Chunxiao Zhang

    (Sichuan Institute of Land and Spatial Planning, #11 MaanRoad, Jinniu District, Chengdu 610084, China)

  • Chun Jia

    (Sichuan Institute of Land and Spatial Planning, #11 MaanRoad, Jinniu District, Chengdu 610084, China)

  • Huanggen Gao

    (Sichuan Institute of Land and Spatial Planning, #11 MaanRoad, Jinniu District, Chengdu 610084, China)

  • Shiguang Shen

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, #159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Urban expansion is constantly encroaching upon and destroying ecological spaces, and the construction of an ecological security pattern with the goal of ensuring ecological security has become a problem that must be considered during urban development. At present, little attention is paid to hilly cities. In this paper, Nanchong City, a typical hilly city, is selected as the research object, and the classic “source–corridor–node” paradigm is adopted to construct the ecological security pattern of Nanchong City. First, the core ecological protection area is taken as the ecological source. Secondly, the index of the ecological resistance surface is selected, and the weight of the index is determined by using the spatial principal component analysis (SPCA) method to construct the ecological resistance surface. The results show that the area of low-resistance biological migration in Nanchong City equals 854 km 2 , which accounts for 6.86% of the total area. Secondly, based on the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model, 34 potential ecological corridors and 41 ecological strategic nodes are identified. Finally, ideas for how to the prioritize ecological security pattern construction in Nanchong City are put forward to provide a reference for the construction of ecological security patterns in hilly cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunxiao Zhang & Chun Jia & Huanggen Gao & Shiguang Shen, 2022. "Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Hilly Areas Based on SPCA and MCR: A Case Study of Nanchong City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11368-:d:911686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Jia Xu & Dawei Xu & Chen Qu, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern and Identification of Ecological Restoration Zones in the City of Changchun, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Shaobo Liu & Yiting Xia & Yifeng Ji & Wenbo Lai & Jiang Li & Yicheng Yin & Jialing Qi & Yating Chang & Hao Sun, 2023. "Balancing Urban Expansion and Ecological Connectivity through Ecological Network Optimization—A Case Study of ChangSha County," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Xinlei Xu & Siyuan Wang & Gege Yan & Xinyi He, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment Based on the “Importance–Sensitivity–Connectivity” Index and Pattern Construction: A Case Study of Xiliu Ditch in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11368-:d:911686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.