IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11170-d908452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterologous Grafting Improves Cold Tolerance of Eggplant

Author

Listed:
  • Duanhua Wang

    (Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha 410125, China)

  • Shuanghua Wu

    (Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha 410125, China)

  • Qian Li

    (Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha 410125, China)

  • Xin Wang

    (Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha 410125, China)

  • Xuefeng Li

    (Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha 410125, China)

  • Feng Liu

    (College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Jianguo Yang

    (Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha 410125, China)

Abstract

Grafting is commonly used to enhance the quality and confer biotic or abiotic stress tolerance to plants. There is, however, no clear understanding of how grafted eggplant responds to cold stress. Here, four grafting combinations of eggplant from cold-sensitive line J55 and cold-resistant line J65 were subjected to morpho-physiological experiments and transcriptome sequencing to compare their responses to cold stress. After being subjected to cold stress, a total of 5883,6608,6867 and 5815 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in J55-J55L0_vs_J55-J55L1 (C0), J55-J65_vs_J55-J65L1 (T2), J65-J55_vs_J65-J55L1 (T1), and J65-J65_vs_J65-J65L1 (C1), respectively. When comparing C0 and C1, there exist 4580 specifical DEGs which were differentially expressed either in C0 or C1 (C0_vs_C1), these DEGs are more likely to induce the difference of the two grafted combinations. There is a total of 5583 specifical DEGs in C0_vs_T1 and 5209 specifical DEGs in C0_vs_T2, respectively. GO functional analysis found specifical DEGs mainly enriched the cell and membrane, catalytic activity, metabolic process, and cellular process, which was the same in comparison to heterografted and self-grafted eggplant in C0_vs_C1, C0_vs_T1 and C0_vs_T2. KEGG analysis showed that the specifical DEGs were mainly enriched in plant hormone signal transduction in C0_vs_C1, C0_vs_T1, and C0_vs_T2. Therefore, we screened ten candidate genes associated with AUX/IAA, salicylic acid and other hormone regulations that were differentially expressed in C0_vs_C1 C0_vs_T1, and C0_vs_T2. We believe that plant hormones play a vital role in regulating the cold tolerance of grafted eggplant. We also found that 22 DEGs enriched in arginine and proline metabolism in comparison to self-and hetero-grafted eggplant C0 and T1, predicted that putrescine biosynthesis plays a certain role in improving the cold resistance of eggplant by heterologous grafting. Meanwhile, by the comparison of specifical DEGs on C0_vs_C1 and C0_vs_T2, the DEGs enriched in a similar KEGG pathway, it is considered that the better cold tolerance of J65 as a scion has a more important effect on the cold resistance of eggplant.

Suggested Citation

  • Duanhua Wang & Shuanghua Wu & Qian Li & Xin Wang & Xuefeng Li & Feng Liu & Jianguo Yang, 2022. "Heterologous Grafting Improves Cold Tolerance of Eggplant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11170-:d:908452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Zhang & Zhiyong Zhang & Qinglian Wang & Peng Chen & Guoping Chen & Ruiyang Zhou, 2013. "Effects of Rootstocks on Cryotolerance and Overwintering Survivorship of Genic Male Sterile Lines in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-7, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11170-:d:908452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.