IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11063-d907030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Soil Moisture to Long-Duration Rainstorms in Three Forest Stands in Mountainous Areas of North China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuhui Tong

    (Geological Survey of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Xinlei Ren

    (College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
    Hunan Lutou Forest Ecosystem National Orientation Observation and Research Station, Yueyang 414000, China
    Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Yu Chen

    (College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
    Hunan Lutou Forest Ecosystem National Orientation Observation and Research Station, Yueyang 414000, China
    Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410004, China)

Abstract

Rainfall is one of the core components of the water cycle in terrestrial ecosystems and is closely related to hydrothermal balance, plant and animal growth, and stability of the whole ecosystem. Long-duration rainstorms can alter the soil structure of forest ecosystems and affect the spatial distribution of soil moisture, thus affecting the water supply from the soil to trees and being one of the factors that increase the vulnerability of forest ecosystems. In recent years, changes in rainfall patterns have normalized prolonged heavy rainfall in the mountainous areas of North China. However, there are few reports on the response of soil water at different depths to historically long rainstorms in forested areas. By quantifying the relationship between precipitation characteristics and soil water, the soil water transport patterns of Platycladus orientalis ( PO ), Quercus variabilis ( QV ) and Pinus tabuliformis ( PT ) during the long-duration rainstorms of 21–22 July 2012 were evaluated separately, and the roles of different plants in response to the historically long rainstorm were determined. The results showed that (1) the response of different forest stands to rainfall had a lag. Among them, the soil water of PO and PT were less affected by rainfall and could maintain a relatively stable state. (2) The soil moisture transport trend of PO was significantly greater than that of other vegetation zones and covered the whole process of rainfall. Under the three typical vegetation covers, there was a continuous zero-flux plane in the soil at each observed depth (the direction of soil moisture flow is more stable over the rainfall period), but there was no regular transport trend. (3) The root system was an important factor, influencing the differences in soil moisture response of the three vegetation types. QV had a higher average effective water recharge rate than lateral cypress and oleander and could better utilize the water recharge from storm water.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuhui Tong & Xinlei Ren & Yu Chen, 2022. "Response of Soil Moisture to Long-Duration Rainstorms in Three Forest Stands in Mountainous Areas of North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11063-:d:907030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11063-:d:907030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.