IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9625-d880884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts on Student Learning and Skills and Implementation Challenges of Two Student-Centered Learning Methods Applied in Online Education

Author

Listed:
  • Lama Soubra

    (Environmental Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti

    (Environmental Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Mohammed Abu-Dieyeh

    (Environmental Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Sergio Crovella

    (Environmental Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Haissam Abou-Saleh

    (Environmental Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
    Biomedical Research Center, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

Abstract

Online education became more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic in many countries around the world, including the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. This study aims at assessing the impacts on learning and skills of two student-centered instructional strategies (problem-based learning (PBL) and just-in-time teaching (JiTT)) used online and their implementation challenges. The PBL and JiTT were implemented in modules taught in various courses delivered at different bachelor’s study levels and disciplines. The research used a mixed design research method. Quantitative data were collected from exam scores and two self-administered surveys. Qualitative data were collected using individual structured interviews. The lecture-based learning method was used for comparisons. A total of 134 students participated in the quizzes and exams, 85 students completed the self-perceived impacts on learning and skills survey, and 82 students completed the implementation challenges survey. Ten students participated in the structured interviews. Tests and survey scores showed that both online PBL and JiTT had significant impacts on students learning and skills and that these effects are consistent across various disciplines. A non-conducive online learning climate, internet connectivity problems, heavy workloads, and time management issues were reported as the implementation challenges. The PBL and JiTT can be considered as effective teaching/learning strategies in online education.

Suggested Citation

  • Lama Soubra & Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti & Mohammed Abu-Dieyeh & Sergio Crovella & Haissam Abou-Saleh, 2022. "Impacts on Student Learning and Skills and Implementation Challenges of Two Student-Centered Learning Methods Applied in Online Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9625-:d:880884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanqi Zhang & Liang Zhou & Xiaoyu Liu & Ling Liu & Yazhou Wu & Zengwei Zhao & Dali Yi & Dong Yi, 2015. "The Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning Teaching Model for Use in Introductory Chinese Undergraduate Medical Courses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Gratiela Dana Boca, 2021. "Factors Influencing Students’ Behavior and Attitude towards Online Education during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Méndez & Miriam Méndez & Juana María Anguita, 2022. "Digital Teaching Competence in Teacher Training as an Element to Attain SDG 4 of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Sterling McCulloch, 2017. "Learning Outcomes in a Laboratory Environment vs. Classroom for Statistics Instruction: An Alternative Approach Using Statistical Software," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(5), pages 131-131, October.
    2. Emily Costan & Gamaliel Gonzales & Roselyn Gonzales & Lynne Enriquez & Felix Costan & Decem Suladay & Nadine May Atibing & Joerabell Lourdes Aro & Samantha Shane Evangelista & Fatima Maturan & Egberto, 2021. "Education 4.0 in Developing Economies: A Systematic Literature Review of Implementation Barriers and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Md Shuhel Miah & Jugindar Singh Kartar Singh & Mohammed Abdur Rahman, 2023. "Factors Influencing Technology Adoption in Online Learning among Private University Students in Bangladesh Post COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Diego Vergara-Rodríguez & Álvaro Antón-Sancho & Pablo Fernández-Arias, 2022. "Variables Influencing Professors’ Adaptation to Digital Learning Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Juan Carlos Bustamante & Manuel Segura-Berges & Manuel Lizalde-Gil & Carlos Peñarrubia-Lozano, 2022. "Qualitative Analyses of e-Learning Implementation and Hybrid Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic at Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Huanhuan Li & Bingyu Duan & Yifang Wang & Huijuan Di & Hongxuan Ge, 2022. "Study on the Influencing Factors of Online Learning and Its Operation Mechanism among Chinese College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic—An Empirical Analysis Based on a Mixed Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9625-:d:880884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.