IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9327-d875440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do We Look for the Right Ones? An Overview of Research Priorities and Conservation Status of Dormice (Gliridae) in Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Lang

    (Clinic for Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish, Working Group for Wildlife Research, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany)

  • Sven Büchner

    (Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Mammalogy Team, 02826 Görlitz, Germany)

  • Holger Meinig

    (Independent Researcher, 42369 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Sandro Bertolino

    (Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

There are differences regarding distribution, conservation status and protection according to national and European laws and directives between the four dormouse species (Gliridae) native to Central Europe. We question the coherence between scientific knowledge and conservation status of dormice in Europe and hypothesize that the species included in the Habitats Directive have been the subject of considerable research, while those not included have been neglected, despite having an unfavourable conservation status. We did a review of the research presented at the International Conferences on Dormice from 1990–2017 and published in the scientific literature since 1950 to see for which species the most research was done and whether the Habitats Directive had an impact. The number of presentations increased over time for the Hazel ( Muscardinus avellanarius , N = 200) and the Edible dormouse ( Glis glis , N = 150), while those on the Garden dormouse ( Eliomys quercinus , N = 46) decreased until 2014 with an apparent increase only in 2017; the Forest dormouse ( Dryomys nitedula , N = 67) does not show any trends. The number of published articles increased for all species except for the Garden dormouse. This focus does not adequately address the current threats of the species. The results can serve as a guide for the re-evaluation of future research priorities and conservation strategies as well as the implementation of new monitoring projects and ecological studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Lang & Sven Büchner & Holger Meinig & Sandro Bertolino, 2022. "Do We Look for the Right Ones? An Overview of Research Priorities and Conservation Status of Dormice (Gliridae) in Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-6, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9327-:d:875440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9327-:d:875440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.