IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8847-d866561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Slope Stability Analysis: A Critical Study on Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Ancuța Rotaru

    (Department of Transportation Infrastructure and Foundations, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 1 Prof. Dr. Doc. Dimitrie Mangeron St., 700050 Iași, Romania)

  • Florin Bejan

    (Department of Transportation Infrastructure and Foundations, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 1 Prof. Dr. Doc. Dimitrie Mangeron St., 700050 Iași, Romania)

  • Dalia Almohamad

    (University of Orléans, University of Tours, INSA-CVL, Lamé, EA 7494, 8 Rue Léonard de Vinci, F-45072 Orléans, France
    Antea Group, ZAC du Moulin, 803 Bd Duhamel du Monceau, 45160 Olivet, France)

Abstract

When studying the stability of a slope, the first issue that needs to be clarified is the slip surface, which determines the minimum safety factor. The slopes investigated here are homogenous with three distinct gradients (1:1.5; 1:1; 2:1), two defined heights (H-3 m; H-8 m), and four different soil characteristics (S1—clayey silt, S2—sandy clayey silt, S3—sandy silty clay, S4—clay). The purpose of this paper is to develop a new methodology capable of estimating the safety factor and the shape and centre of the critical slip surface, delivering an improved estimate of slope probability of failure, which can represent a significant component in a more precise risk assessment. This paper compares distinct methods used in the slope stability analysis, examining their hypotheses and effects on the estimated safety factor and the centre and shape of the critical slip surface. The study compares the limit equilibrium results with those determined by the shear strength reduction method using an approach based on the upper-bound limit analysis to compare the predictions extracted from these methods with those from the finite element method (FEM) analysis. The finite element method discretizes the soil mass into finite elements. Hence, it establishes a kinematically admissible velocity field searching for the failure mechanism of the slope. Results for FEM show the influence of the slope geometry and the mesh size and density on the safety factor. In the study, plots of the regression curves of five different critical slip surface shapes, including a circular slip surface (benchmark), show that the shape of the failure surface depends on the shape and material of the slope. Furthermore, they show that the critical slip surface layout can approach a logarithmic spiral, damped sinusoid, parabola, etc.; the slip surface is not always circular. The analysis reveals that none of the approaches can consider all uncertainties concerning the factor of safety and the interpretations of critical slip surfaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ancuța Rotaru & Florin Bejan & Dalia Almohamad, 2022. "Sustainable Slope Stability Analysis: A Critical Study on Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-30, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8847-:d:866561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junhao Zhong & Shihe Zhao & Pengqin Wang & Chuantan Hou, 2023. "Tunnel Face Stability Considering the Influence of Excess Slurry Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Wei Cao & Zheng Wan & Wenjing Li, 2023. "Stability of Unsaturated Soil Slope Considering Stratigraphic Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8847-:d:866561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.