IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7723-d846913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Adsorption Capacity and Removal Efficiency of Strontium by Six Typical Adsorption Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Hu Li

    (Jinan Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, China)

  • Kexue Han

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jinhua Shang

    (Jinan Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, China)

  • Weihai Cai

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Minghao Pan

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Donghui Xu

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Can Du

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Rui Zuo

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

The rapid development and application of nuclear technology have been accompanied by the production of large amounts of radioactive wastes, of which Sr is a typical nuclide. In this study, six typical materials with strong adsorption properties, namely activated carbon, kaolin, montmorillonite, bentonite, zeolite, and attapulgite, were selected. Their adsorption mechanisms were investigated by analyzing their adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, micromorphologies, element contents, specific surface areas, crystal structures, and functional groups. The results showed that the adsorption efficiency of Sr by the six adsorbents can be ranked as zeolite, bentonite, attapulgite, montmorillonite, activated carbon, and kaolin, among which the maximum adsorption capacity of zeolite was 4.07 mg/g. Based on the adsorption kinetic and thermodynamic fitting results, the adsorption of Sr by zeolites, bentonite and attapulgite is consistent with Langmuir model, the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order model, and the adsorption process of Sr (II) by montmorillonite, activated carbon and kaolinite is consistent with the Freundlich model and corresponds to non-uniform adsorption. The main mechanisms of the six materials are physical adsorption, ion exchange and complexation. In summary, zeolite, bentonite, and attapulgite, especially zeolite, are highly effective for the treatment of radioactive wastewater containing strontium and have great application value in the treatment of radioactive wastes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu Li & Kexue Han & Jinhua Shang & Weihai Cai & Minghao Pan & Donghui Xu & Can Du & Rui Zuo, 2022. "Comparison of Adsorption Capacity and Removal Efficiency of Strontium by Six Typical Adsorption Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7723-:d:846913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7723-:d:846913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.