IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7485-d842686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Singapore Soundscape Site Selection Survey (S 5 ): Identification of Characteristic Soundscapes of Singapore via Weighted k -Means Clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Ooi

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Bhan Lam

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Joo-Young Hong

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea)

  • Karn N. Watcharasupat

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Zhen-Ting Ong

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Woon-Seng Gan

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

Abstract

The ecological validity of soundscape studies usually rests on the choice of soundscapes that are representative of the perceptual space under investigation. For example, a soundscape pleasantness study might investigate locations with soundscapes ranging from “pleasant” to “annoying”. The choice of soundscapes is typically researcher led, but a participant-led process can reduce selection bias and improve result reliability. Hence, we propose a robust participant-led method to pinpoint characteristic soundscapes possessing arbitrary perceptual attributes. We validate our method by identifying Singaporean soundscapes spanning the perceptual quadrants generated from the “Pleasantness” and “Eventfulness” axes of the ISO 12913-2 circumplex model of soundscape perception, as perceived by local experts. From memory and experience, 67 participants first selected locations corresponding to each perceptual quadrant in each major planning region of Singapore. We then performed weighted k -means clustering on the selected locations, with weights for each location derived from previous frequencies and durations spent in each location by each participant. Weights hence acted as proxies for participant confidence. In total, 62 locations were thereby identified as suitable locations with characteristic soundscapes for further research utilizing the ISO 12913-2 perceptual quadrants. Audio–visual recordings and acoustic characterization of the soundscapes will be made in a future study.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Ooi & Bhan Lam & Joo-Young Hong & Karn N. Watcharasupat & Zhen-Ting Ong & Woon-Seng Gan, 2022. "Singapore Soundscape Site Selection Survey (S 5 ): Identification of Characteristic Soundscapes of Singapore via Weighted k -Means Clustering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7485-:d:842686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7485/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7485/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simone Torresin & Rossano Albatici & Francesco Aletta & Francesco Babich & Jian Kang, 2019. "Assessment Methods and Factors Determining Positive Indoor Soundscapes in Residential Buildings: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baoqing Song & Chenyu Gong & Yicheng Gao & Yue Ke & Zehua Wang & Ruichong Lin & Yunji Cai, 2022. "Music Literacy and Soundscape Perception: A Study Based on the Soundwalk Method of Soundscapes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Marina Eirini Stamatiadou & Iordanis Thoidis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Lazaros Vrysis & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "Semantic Crowdsourcing of Soundscapes Heritage: A Mojo Model for Data-Driven Storytelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Yoshimi Hasegawa & Siu-Kit Lau, 2021. "Audiovisual Bimodal and Interactive Effects for Soundscape Design of the Indoor Environments: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Aleksandra Nenadović & Jelena Milošević, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Buildings: Structural Design Based on the Criterion of Social Benefits for Building Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Pyoung Jik Lee & Carl Hopkins & Rafaella Penedo, 2020. "Attitudes to Noise Inside Dwellings in Three Megacities: Seoul, London, and São Paulo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Juan Miguel Barrigón Morillas & David Montes González & Rosendo Vílchez-Gómez & Valentín Gómez Escobar & Rubén Maderuelo-Sanz & Guillermo Rey Gozalo & Pedro Atanasio Moraga, 2021. "Virgin Natural Cork Characterization as a Sustainable Material for Use in Acoustic Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Antonio Laurìa & Simone Secchi & Luigi Vessella, 2020. "Acoustic Comfort as a Salutogenic Resource in Learning Environments—A Proposal for the Design of a System to Improve the Acoustic Quality of Classrooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Simone Torresin & Francesco Aletta & Francesco Babich & Ethan Bourdeau & Jack Harvie-Clark & Jian Kang & Lisa Lavia & Antonella Radicchi & Rossano Albatici, 2020. "Acoustics for Supportive and Healthy Buildings: Emerging Themes on Indoor Soundscape Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7485-:d:842686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.