IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7106-d835498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprints and Life Cycle Assessments of Inhalers: A Review of Published Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Brett Fulford

    (Novartis Phama AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Karen Mezzi

    (Novartis Phama AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Simon Aumônier

    (Environmental Resources Management, London EC3A 8AA, UK)

  • Matthias Finkbeiner

    (Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Respiratory inhalers have a substantial impact on the carbon footprint of the healthcare sector. Environmental factors, including carbon footprints, are gaining importance in choosing inhalers once medical considerations have been addressed. This paper provides a review of the carbon footprint (CFP) and life cycle assessment (LCA) environmental profile of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). Despite methodological challenges, our analysis reveals that the CFP varies between DPIs ranging from 359 gCO 2 e per inhaler (Enerzair Breezhaler ® DPI without digital companion 30-day pack) to 1250 gCO 2 e per inhaler (Seretide Accuhaler ® 50/500) and from 6.13 gCO 2 e per dose (Enerzair Breezhaler ® without digital companion 90-day pack) to 27 gCO 2 e per dose (Relvar Elipta 92/22). The breakdown of inhaler CFP by life cycle stage reveals that, although the use and end-of-life stages together contribute to most of the CFP of the MDIs, the largest contributions to the CFP of the DPI/SMI are made by the API and manufacturing stages of the life cycle. Although from a climate perspective our review aligns with the findings of Jeswani and Azapagic that DPIs have a lower CFP than pMDIs, we conclude that the performance against other environment impact categories depends on the design, choice of material and manufacturing process of the DPIs. The challenge of comparing the CFP of different inhalers can be made easier by the standardization of study boundaries and methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Brett Fulford & Karen Mezzi & Simon Aumônier & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2022. "Carbon Footprints and Life Cycle Assessments of Inhalers: A Review of Published Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7106-:d:835498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brett Fulford & Karen Mezzi & Andy Whiting & Simon Aumônier, 2021. "Life-Cycle Assessment of the Breezhaler ® Breath-Actuated Dry Powder Inhaler," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7106-:d:835498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.