IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6212-d819699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Knowledge and Modern Motivations for Consuming Seaweed (Limu) in Samoa

Author

Listed:
  • Ulusapeti Tiitii

    (School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia
    Fisheries Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Apia WS 1300, Samoa)

  • Nicholas Paul

    (School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia)

  • Sarah Burkhart

    (School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia
    Australian Center for Pacific Islands Research, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia)

  • Silva Larson

    (School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia)

  • Libby Swanepoel

    (School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia
    Australian Center for Pacific Islands Research, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia)

Abstract

Seaweeds are a traditional food throughout the Pacific. In Samoa, the edible seaweeds limu fuafua (sea grapes, Caulerpa racemosa and C. chemnitzia ) and limu a’au (red seaweed, Halymenia durvillei and Halymenia sp.) are hand-harvested and consumed fresh or cooked, respectively. However, there is limited scientific or traditional documentation of these commodities. Here, we assess the traditional use and cultural value of edible seaweeds and explore modern consumer preferences and perceived nutritional benefits. Structured enumerator-administered questionnaires were used to examine the relationship between consumption and demographics and subsequently to assess the key motivators for consumption, including perceived nutritional benefits. A total of 320 participants were surveyed across 20 village communities, with 95% reporting consumption of Caulerpa and 40% of Halymenia . Consumption was primarily on a weekly to monthly basis, and even once a day. Motivators and barriers for consumption were then assessed in 320 village participants with an additional 203 intercept interviews at fish markets. A content analysis of the open-ended questions revealed the key motivators for eating limu were health and taste (positive), whereas the key barriers were taste (negative) and availability. We identify opportunities to develop a nutrient evidence base for Samoan seaweeds to aid in marketing, especially for youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulusapeti Tiitii & Nicholas Paul & Sarah Burkhart & Silva Larson & Libby Swanepoel, 2022. "Traditional Knowledge and Modern Motivations for Consuming Seaweed (Limu) in Samoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6212-:d:819699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayley Butcher & Sarah Burkhart & Nicholas Paul & Ulusapeti Tiitii & Karibanang Tamuera & Taati Eria & Libby Swanepoel, 2020. "Role of Seaweed in Diets of Samoa and Kiribati: Exploring Key Motivators for Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andi Syahrullah Sulaimana & Bara Yudhistira & Chao-Kai Chang & Mohsen Gavahian & Cheng-Chia Yu & Chih-Yao Hou & Chang-Wei Hsieh, 2022. "Optimized Alternating Current Electric Field and Light Irradiance for Caulerpa lentillifera Biomass Sustainability—An Innovative Approach for Potential Postharvest Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andi Syahrullah Sulaimana & Bara Yudhistira & Chao-Kai Chang & Mohsen Gavahian & Cheng-Chia Yu & Chih-Yao Hou & Chang-Wei Hsieh, 2022. "Optimized Alternating Current Electric Field and Light Irradiance for Caulerpa lentillifera Biomass Sustainability—An Innovative Approach for Potential Postharvest Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Grace Kammholz & Dana Craven & Ramona Boodoosingh & Safua Akeli Amaama & Jyothi Abraham & Sarah Burkhart, 2021. "Exploring Food Literacy Domains in an Adult Samoan Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6212-:d:819699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.