IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5965-d815647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Dust Abatement Costs in Construction Demolition Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Zhuan He

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Huapeng Chen

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
    Department of Engineering Science, School of Civil Engineering, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK)

  • Cheng Lin

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Zeyi Qiu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

Dust pollution arising out of building demolition has serious health implications on workers, as well as the neighboring communities. Existing research has shown that regulatory and engineering control methods are the most popular for dust pollution control on demolition sites. Though engineering control methods are effective in suppressing dust pollution, they have enormous cost implications for demolition companies. Therefore, accurate prediction of dust treatment costs is an important element of the demolition planning process. However, very little information is available in the existing research about treatment costs. In addition, there has not been any attempt to develop a model which can accurately predict the cost of dust treatment during building demolition. To overcome this knowledge gap, a grey prediction model is built according to the information obtained from twenty previous demolition projects. The historical trend of demolition project cost is combined to establish the prediction model based on GM (1, 1), which can be used to obtain the dust treatment cost of a project with very high accuracy. To further improve the prediction accuracy, this paper also builds a Single Function Residual Identifiability (SFRI) model. The relative error between the actual and predicted dust treatment costs from 2013 to 2021 ranges from 0.003% to 0.077%. Through detailed assessment of various treatment measures using a case study, it was found that the results obtained by the prediction model are very close to the actual costs incurred, which verifies the accuracy of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Zhuan He & Huapeng Chen & Cheng Lin & Zeyi Qiu, 2022. "Prediction of Dust Abatement Costs in Construction Demolition Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5965-:d:815647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5965-:d:815647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.