IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5314-d551576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seismic Behavior of Stone Pagoda Structure by Shaking Table Test

Author

Listed:
  • Ho-Soo Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Korea)

  • Dong-Kwan Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Korea)

  • Geon-Woo Jeon

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Korea)

  • Sang-Sun Jo

    (National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage (NRICH), Daejeon 34122, Korea)

  • Se-Hyun Kim

    (National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage (NRICH), Daejeon 34122, Korea)

Abstract

In general, the stone pagoda structures with discontinuous surfaces are vulnerable to lateral forces and are severely damaged by earthquakes. After the Gyeongju earthquake in 2016 and the Pohang earthquake in 2017, numerous stone pagoda structures were damaged due to slippage, rotation, and the separation of stacked stone. To evaluate seismic resistance of masonry stone pagoda structures, we analyzed the seismic behavior of stone pagoda structures using the shaking table test. Shaking frequency, permanent displacement, maximum acceleration, rocking, and sliding were assessed. Responses to simulations of the Bingol, Gyeongju, and Pohang earthquakes based on the Korean seismic design standard (KDS 41 17 00) were analyzed for return periods of 1000 and 2400 years. We found that the type of stylobate affected the seismic resistance of the stone pagoda structure. When the stylobates were stiff, seismic energy was transferred from lower to upper regions of the stone pagoda, which mainly resulted in deformation of the upper region. When the stylobates were weak, earthquake energy was absorbed in the lower regions, which was associated with large stylobate deformations. The lower part of the tower body was mainly affected by rocking, because the structural members were slender. The higher part of the stone pagoda was mainly affected by sliding, because the load and contact area decreased with height.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho-Soo Kim & Dong-Kwan Kim & Geon-Woo Jeon & Sang-Sun Jo & Se-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Seismic Behavior of Stone Pagoda Structure by Shaking Table Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5314-:d:551576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola Ruggieri, 2021. "Damage Assessment of Historical Masonry Churches Subjected to Moderate Intensity Seismic Shaking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Belardi & Vittorio Gusella & Riccardo Liberotti & Camilla Sorignani, 2022. "Built Environment’s Sustainability: The Design of the Gypso|TechA of the University of Perugia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5314-:d:551576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.