IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4506-d538459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of the Variability in Fatty Acids and Carotenoid Profiles: Laying the Ground for Tank Milk Authentication

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Villar

    (Centro de Investigación y Formación Agrarias (CIFA), Gobierno de Cantabria, 39600 Muriedas, Spain)

  • Ibán Vázquez-González

    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Escola Politécnica Superior de Enxeñaría de Lugo, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), 27002 Lugo, Spain)

  • Fernando Vicente

    (Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), 33300 Villaviciosa, Spain)

  • Gregorio Salcedo

    (CIFP “La Granja”, 39792 Heras, Spain)

  • Laura González

    (Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo (CIAM), 15318 Abegondo, Spain)

  • Adrián Botana

    (Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo (CIAM), 15318 Abegondo, Spain)

  • Luís José Royo

    (Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), 33300 Villaviciosa, Spain)

  • Paola Eguinoa

    (Instituto Navarro de Tecnologías e Infraestructuras Agroalimentarias, 31610 Villava, Spain)

  • Juan Busqué

    (Centro de Investigación y Formación Agrarias (CIFA), Gobierno de Cantabria, 39600 Muriedas, Spain)

Abstract

This study analyzes 174 tank milk samples taken from 89 commercial farms located all along the Cantabrian Coast (Green Spain). Sampling was performed in two periods: autumn 2016 and spring 2017. A survey was carried out for every day of sampling to record the average lactating dairy cow production and its diet composition. For each sample, the fatty acid (FA) profile (49 FA plus its main relationships) and nine fat-soluble antioxidant (FSA) profiles (retinol (vitamin A), α- and Υ-tocopherol (vitamin E), all-trans-β-carotene, 9-cis-β-carotene, 13-cis-β-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-cryptoxanthin) were determined. The milk production varied between 7.3 and 45.9 liters per cow per day, highlighting the diversity found among production systems. The milk fat content ranged from 2.64% to 4.38% and the protein content from 2.87% to 3.56%. Regarding the fatty acids profile, the percentage of saturated fat varied between 59.95% and 75.99%. The linolenic acid content fluctuated between 0.21 and 1.31 and rumenic acid ranged from 0.20 to 2.47 (g 100 g −1 total FA). The most important correlations between diet and milk FA were always related to the content of fresh grass and total forage (which is defined by both fresh and conserved forage derived from fresh grass (GCF)) in the diet. The content of vaccenic acid, linolenic acid, total omega-3, rumenic acid, and total CLA isomers showed the highest correlation with the proportion of fresh grass in the diet. The antioxidant contents were also highly variable, although correlations with dietary components were lower. The highest correlations were between total forage content (fresh grass (FG) plus GCF) and lutein, all-trans-β-carotene, and 13-cis-β-carotene. Diets without fresh grass had lower omega-3 content, CLA, vaccenic acid, lutein, all-trans-β-carotene, and 13-cis-β-carotene.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Villar & Ibán Vázquez-González & Fernando Vicente & Gregorio Salcedo & Laura González & Adrián Botana & Luís José Royo & Paola Eguinoa & Juan Busqué, 2021. "Study of the Variability in Fatty Acids and Carotenoid Profiles: Laying the Ground for Tank Milk Authentication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4506-:d:538459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4506/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Villar & Gregorio Salcedo & Ibán Vázquez-González & Elena Suárez & Juan Busqué, 2021. "Is It Possible to Estimate the Composition of a Cow’s Diet Based on the Parameters of Its Milk?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4506-:d:538459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.