Author
Listed:
- Felipe Piana Vendramell Ferreira
(Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, 13565-905 São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil)
- Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis
(School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)
- Carlos Humberto Martins
(Department of Civil Engineering, State University of Maringá, 87020-900 Maringá, Paraná, Brazil)
- Silvana De Nardin
(Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, 13565-905 São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil)
Abstract
Industrialization of construction makes building operation more environmental friendly and sustainable. This change is necessary as it is an industry that demands large consumption of water and energy, as well as being responsible for the disposal of a high volume of waste. However, the transformation of the construction sector is a big challenge worldwide. It is also well known that the largest proportion of the material used in multistory buildings, and thus its carbon impact, is attributed to their slabs being the main contributor of weight. Steel-Concrete composite beams with precast hollow-core slabs (PCHCSs) were developed due to their technical and economic benefits, owing to their high strength and concrete self-weight reduction, making this system economical and with lower environmental footprint, thus reducing carbon emissions. Significant research has been carried out on deep hollow-core slabs due to the need to overcome larger spans that resist high loads. The publication SCI P401, in accordance with Eurocode 4, is however limited to hollow-core slabs with depths from 150 to 250 mm, with or without a concrete topping. This paper aims to investigate hollow-core slabs with a concrete topping to understand their effect on the flexural behavior of Steel-Concrete composite beams, considering the hollow-core-slab depth is greater than the SCI P401 recommendation. Consequently, 150 mm and 265 mm hollow-core units with a concrete topping were considered to assess the increase of the hollow core unit depth. A comprehensive computational parametric study was conducted by varying the in situ infill concrete strength, the transverse reinforcement rate, the shear connector spacing, and the cross-section of steel. Both full and partial interaction models were examined, and in some cases similar resistances were obtained, meaning that the same strength can be obtained for a smaller number of shear studs, i.e., less energy consumption, thus a reduction in the embodied energy. The calculation procedure, according to Eurocode 4 was in favor of safety for the partial-interaction hypothesis.
Suggested Citation
Felipe Piana Vendramell Ferreira & Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis & Carlos Humberto Martins & Silvana De Nardin, 2021.
"Steel-Concrete Composite Beams with Precast Hollow-Core Slabs: A Sustainable Solution,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4230-:d:533800
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Da Wang & Benkun Tan & Shengtao Xiang & Xie Wang, 2022.
"Fatigue Crack Propagation and Life Analysis of Stud Connectors in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
- Laurentiu-Mihai Ionescu & Nicu Bizon & Alin-Gheorghita Mazare & Nadia Belu, 2020.
"Reducing the Cost of Electricity by Optimizing Real-Time Consumer Planning Using a New Genetic Algorithm-Based Strategy,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-26, July.
- Shraddha Sharma & Anshuman Singh, 2024.
"Embodied energy assessment: a comprehensive review of methods and software tools,"
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30109-30179, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4230-:d:533800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.