IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3316-d518899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Barriers Identification, Classification, and Ways to Improve Safety Performance in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry: Review Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed N. Maliha

    (Department of Construction Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Yazan I. Abu Aisheh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

  • Bassam A. Tayeh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza 9990300, Palestine)

  • Ali Almalki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry is one of the most dangerous industries due to its unique nature. Safety is a critical issue in developed and developing countries. The main objective of this paper was to identify and classify the barriers that hinder the implementation of safety in projects and ways to improve safety performance. The method used in this paper includes a heavy review of many sources related to the safety barriers in the AEC industry, including a process of identification and classification of these barriers, after which we discuss the most popular methods between them, based on the appearance of it in the sources which were reviewed. Then, the ways to improve safety performance were viewed in AEC industry. Based on that, it was found that there are the following 4 categories associated with safety barriers: (1) Behavior Barriers; (2) Management Barriers; (3) Awareness Barriers; and (4) Culture Barriers. At the same time, the most popular barriers are based on appearance in sources: lack of safety training, lack of commitment, work pressure is high when deadlines are approaching, and low level education, lack of experience, and lack of knowledge. The many ways to improve safety performance are illustrated in the end of this paper. The results of this paper show the importance of safety and that the actual safety of the projects should be focused on in order to reduce injuries, accidents, and reduce barriers of applying safety, which will enhance the sustainability and development of safe environments within in AEC industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed N. Maliha & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ali Almalki, 2021. "Safety Barriers Identification, Classification, and Ways to Improve Safety Performance in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry: Review Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3316-:d:518899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3316/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuanjing Ju & Steve Rowlinson, 2014. "Institutional determinants of construction safety management strategies of contractors in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7-8), pages 725-736, August.
    2. Yang Miang Goh & David Chua, 2013. "Neural network analysis of construction safety management systems: a case study in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 460-470, May.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:455310 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Walters, David., 2010. "The role of worker representation and consultation in managing health and safety in the construction industry," ILO Working Papers 994553103402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yazan Issa Abu Aisheh, 2021. "Lessons Learned, Barriers, and Improvement Factors for Mega Building Construction Projects in Developing Countries: Review Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yikun Su & Shijing Yang & Kangning Liu & Kaicheng Hua & Qi Yao, 2019. "Developing A Case-Based Reasoning Model for Safety Accident Pre-Control and Decision Making in the Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Pengyu Chen & Zhongzhu Chu, 2024. "Mere facade? Is greenwashing behaviour lower in low‐carbon corporates?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4162-4174, July.
    3. Albert P. C. Chan & Junfeng Guan & Tracy N. Y. Choi & Yang Yang & Guangdong Wu & Edmond Lam, 2023. "Improving Safety Performance of Construction Workers through Learning from Incidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Hafiz Zahoor & Albert P. C. Chan & Wahyudi P. Utama & Ran Gao & Irfan Zafar, 2017. "Modeling the Relationship between Safety Climate and Safety Performance in a Developing Construction Industry: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Comaru, Francisco. & Werna, Edmundo., 2013. "The health of workers in selected sectors of the urban economy : challenges and perspectives," ILO Working Papers 994805563402676, International Labour Organization.
    6. Mohd. Ahmed & Saeed AlQadhi & Javed Mallick & Nabil Ben Kahla & Hoang Anh Le & Chander Kumar Singh & Hoang Thi Hang, 2022. "Artificial Neural Networks for Sustainable Development of the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3316-:d:518899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.