IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2464-d505419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slow-Release Urea as a Sustainable Alternative to Soybean Meal in Ruminant Nutrition

Author

Listed:
  • Saheed A. Salami

    (Solutions Deployment Team, Alltech (UK) Ltd., Stamford PE9 1TZ, UK)

  • Maria Devant

    (Ruminant Research Department, IRTA Torre Marimon, Caldes Montbui, 08140 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Juha Apajalahti

    (Alimetrics Research Ltd., 02920 Espoo, Finland)

  • Vaughn Holder

    (Centre for Applied and Animal Nutrition, Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, KY 40356, USA)

  • Sini Salomaa

    (Alimetrics Research Ltd., 02920 Espoo, Finland)

  • Jason D. Keegan

    (Regulatory Affairs Department, Alltech European Bioscience Centre, A86 X006 Meath, Ireland)

  • Colm A. Moran

    (Regulatory Affairs Department, Alltech SARL, 14500 Vire, France)

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using a commercial slow-release urea product (SRU; Optigen ® , Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, KY, USA) as a partial replacement for vegetable protein sources in cattle diets. The first experiment was an in vitro rumen fermentation that evaluated the effect of replacing soybean meal (SBM) nitrogen with nitrogen from either SRU or free urea in diets varying in forage:concentrate ratios. The second experiment examined the effect of replacing SBM with SRU on in situ dry matter and nitrogen degradability in the rumen. In the third experiment, a feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of replacing SBM (0% as-fed SRU) with 1% or 3% as-fed SRU on feed carbon footprint (CFP; total greenhouse gas emissions associated with the life cycle of feed raw materials) and the toxicity potential of SRU in growing beef cattle. Results showed that replacing SBM with SRU up to 1.3% did not negatively affect in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. Supplementing SRU favourably decreased ruminal accumulation of ammonia and lactic acid when compared to free urea. There was no significant effect on effective rumen degradability of dry matter and nitrogen when one-third of SBM was replaced by SRU in the in situ study. Compared with the 0% SRU diet, feed CFP decreased by 18% and 54% in 1% SRU and 3% SRU diets, respectively. Additionally, feeding up to 3% SRU diet to beef cattle did not affect health and intake, and blood hematological and biochemical indices were within the physiological range for healthy bulls, suggesting no indication of ammonia toxicity. Overall, these results indicate that SRU can be used as a sustainable alternative to partially replace vegetable protein sources in ruminant diets without compromising rumen function and health of ruminants.

Suggested Citation

  • Saheed A. Salami & Maria Devant & Juha Apajalahti & Vaughn Holder & Sini Salomaa & Jason D. Keegan & Colm A. Moran, 2021. "Slow-Release Urea as a Sustainable Alternative to Soybean Meal in Ruminant Nutrition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2464-:d:505419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saheed A Salami & Colm A Moran & Helen E Warren & Jules Taylor-Pickard, 2021. "Meta-analysis and sustainability of feeding slow-release urea in dairy production," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2464-:d:505419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.