IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1917-d497411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data

Author

Listed:
  • Alma Elizabeth Thuestad

    (High North Department, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU), Fram Centre, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway)

  • Ole Risbøl

    (Department of Archaeology and Cultural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Jan Ingolf Kleppe

    (Troms and Finnmark County Council, Fylkeshuset, N-9815 Vadsø, Norway)

  • Stine Barlindhaug

    (Sámediggi–The Sami Parliament, N-9735 Karasjok, Norway)

  • Elin Rose Myrvoll

    (Sámediggi–The Sami Parliament, N-9735 Karasjok, Norway)

Abstract

What can remote sensing contribute to archaeological surveying in subarctic and arctic landscapes? The pros and cons of remote sensing data vary as do areas of utilization and methodological approaches. We assessed the applicability of remote sensing for archaeological surveying of northern landscapes using airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) and satellite and aerial images to map archaeological features as a basis for (a) assessing the pros and cons of the different approaches and (b) assessing the potential detection rate of remote sensing. Interpretation of images and a LiDAR-based bare-earth digital terrain model (DTM) was based on visual analyses aided by processing and visualizing techniques. 368 features were identified in the aerial images, 437 in the satellite images and 1186 in the DTM. LiDAR yielded the better result, especially for hunting pits. Image data proved suitable for dwellings and settlement sites. Feature characteristics proved a key factor for detectability, both in LiDAR and image data. This study has shown that LiDAR and remote sensing image data are highly applicable for archaeological surveying in northern landscapes. It showed that a multi-sensor approach contributes to high detection rates. Our results have improved the inventory of archaeological sites in a non-destructive and minimally invasive manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Alma Elizabeth Thuestad & Ole Risbøl & Jan Ingolf Kleppe & Stine Barlindhaug & Elin Rose Myrvoll, 2021. "Archaeological Surveying of Subarctic and Arctic Landscapes: Comparing the Performance of Airborne Laser Scanning and Remote Sensing Image Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1917-:d:497411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Zhang & Chang Zhang, 2022. "Classification and Application of Digital Technologies in Landscape Heritage Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1917-:d:497411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.