IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1860-d495969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Replacement Strategies for Bentonite in Wine Using Alternative Protein Fining Agents

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Sommer

    (Viticulture and Enology Research Center, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA)

  • Federico Tondini

    (AEB Biochemical USA, Lodi, CA 95240, USA)

Abstract

Protein stability is an important quality attribute in wines and protein haze will lead to consumer rejection. Traditionally, stability is achieved by bentonite addition; however, environmental concerns and disposal problems mean that alternatives are required to achieve the same goal. In this study, the use of Sacharomyces paradoxus , chitosan, polystyrene, carboxymethyl cellulose, and bentonite were evaluated. Trials in finished wines were agitated for 10 h overnight and analyzed for turbidity and color characteristics spectrophotometrically. Experiments were conducted with wines that are expected to develop protein instabilities, Muscat Canelli, White Zinfandel, Cabernet Sauvignon blanc de noir, Barbera rosé, and Touriga Nacional. Results indicate that S. paradoxus can help with the removal of proteins from wine. Wines with low protein instability can be stabilized with S. paradoxus as well as polystyrene and chitosan to a lesser degree. All fining agents except for bentonite show efficiency variability between white and red wines. With an average protein reduction around 50%, none of the alternative fining methods could reach the efficiency level of bentonite. Experiments in a model system confirm the findings and explain some of the mechanisms involved, for example the specificity of chitosan and challenges related to the use of yeast as a fining agent.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Sommer & Federico Tondini, 2021. "Sustainable Replacement Strategies for Bentonite in Wine Using Alternative Protein Fining Agents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1860-:d:495969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1860-:d:495969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.