IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1612-d492400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on Air Pollution Characteristics in Four Key Cities during 2013 in Guangxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing-Ying Mao

    (Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
    Scientific Research Academy of Guangxi Environmental Protection, Nanning 530022, China)

  • Zhi-Ming Chen

    (Scientific Research Academy of Guangxi Environmental Protection, Nanning 530022, China)

  • Zong-Kai Jiang

    (College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Zhao-Yu Mo

    (Scientific Research Academy of Guangxi Environmental Protection, Nanning 530022, China)

  • Hong-Jiao Li

    (Scientific Research Academy of Guangxi Environmental Protection, Nanning 530022, China)

  • Fan Meng

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Bei Chen

    (Guangxi Environmental Monitoring Centre, Nanning 530028, China)

  • Hui-Jiao Ling

    (Scientific Research Academy of Guangxi Environmental Protection, Nanning 530022, China)

  • Hong Li

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

Abstract

Based on ambient air quality data of the four key cities (Nanning, Liuzhou, Guilin, and Beihai) in Guangxi, China, along with an analysis of the main emission sources, topographic features, weather conditions, and backward trajectories, the variation of main air pollutants and pollution episodes in the four cities were studied. Results showed that air pollution was most serious in Liuzhou and Guilin, followed by Nanning and Beihai. PM 2.5 was the dominant pollutant in each city, followed by O 3 , PM 10 , and NO 2 . Concentrations of SO 2 and CO did not exceed their National Ambient Air Quality Standard Grade II limit values. In the cities, the concentrations of PM 2.5 , PM 10 , NO 2 , and SO 2 were high during fall and winter and low during spring and summer, while the concentrations of O 3 were high during fall and low during the other seasons. Concentrations of CO were low during summer and high during the other seasons in Nanning and Liuzhou, while they were high during spring and winter and low during summer and fall in Guilin and Beihai. In these cities, pollution episodes resulted mainly from stagnant accumulation and showed characteristics of regional pollution. However, pollution levels and durations for each city were different due to differences in main pollution sources, local geography, and weather conditions. The influences of air masses on the four cities were similar. They were mainly influenced by local emission sources in the spring, while during autumn, long-distance transportation from Hunan and Hubei was significant. In winter, air pollution in Nanning and Beihai was mostly affected by local emission sources, and that in Liuzhou and Guilin was mainly affected by long-distance transportation from the south and northeast of Guangxi.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing-Ying Mao & Zhi-Ming Chen & Zong-Kai Jiang & Zhao-Yu Mo & Hong-Jiao Li & Fan Meng & Bei Chen & Hui-Jiao Ling & Hong Li, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Air Pollution Characteristics in Four Key Cities during 2013 in Guangxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1612-:d:492400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1612-:d:492400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.