IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1204-d486050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Alternate Materials for Concrete Production from Renewable Source and Waste

Author

Listed:
  • R. Ramasubramani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 603203, India)

  • K. Gunasekaran

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 603203, India)

Abstract

Natural resources are being continuously extracted for the production of concrete which leads to degradation of the ecosystem. This is also a challenge for sustainability to save Nature. This study seeks to identify a suitable replacement material for river sand and stone aggregate for the sustainable utilization of renewable sources. Manufactured sand (M-sand) from industrial by-products and coconut shell (CS), an agricultural waste, are the resources selected as replacement materials for sustainability. This study uses M-sand as fine aggregate and CS coarse aggregate in place of river sand (R-sand) and crushed stone aggregate (CSA) for concrete production, respectively. To prove that M-sand and CS are sustainable alternate materials, this study focused on the microstructural characteristics on concrete constituents and CS aggregate and also conducted on concrete produced using R-sand, M-sand and CS. Also, this study focused on the microstructural characteristics and properties of conventional concrete (CC) and coconut shell concrete (CSC) produced using both R-sand and M-sand. Since this study aims to find sustainable alternative materials for R-sand and CSA by M-sand and CS, its properties are studied and compared since microstructural characterization is very significant for concrete compatibility. Microstructural studies revealed that the use of M-sand does not affect the microstructural properties of concrete compared to R-sand concrete and rather it improves the strength of concrete. A similar same trend was observed when CS was used with M-sand compared to CS used with R-sand. Hence, this study strongly suggests that the use of M-sand in its place of R-sand and CS in its place of CSA are sustainable alternatives for the production of concrete so that natural resources can be saved and hence sustainability could be sustained.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Ramasubramani & K. Gunasekaran, 2021. "Sustainable Alternate Materials for Concrete Production from Renewable Source and Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1204-:d:486050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalaivani Kumarasamy & Gunasekaran Kandasamy & Annadurai Ramasamy, 2023. "Elucidation of Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Coconut Husk Mortar as a Sustainable Building Material for Ferrocement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1204-:d:486050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.