IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p638-d478433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Business Intelligence & Analytics Framework for Clean and Affordable Energy Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Muntean

    (Department of Business Information Systems, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Doina Dănăiaţă

    (Department of Business Information Systems, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Luminiţa Hurbean

    (Department of Business Information Systems, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Cornelia Jude

    (Flat White Economy Investment, 020335 Bucuresti, Romania)

Abstract

Energy is the sector most strongly connected with climate change moderation, and this correlation and interdependency is largely investigated, in particular as regards renewable energy and sustainability issues. The United Nations, European Union, and all countries around the world declare their support for sustainable development, materialized in agreements, strategies, and action plans. This diversity, combined with significant interdependencies between indicators, brings up challenges for data analysis, which we have tackled in order to decide on relevant indicators. We have built a research framework based on Business Intelligence & Analytics for monitoring the SDG7 indicators that aim at “Ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all”, in relation with SDG13 indicators targeting the sustainable aspect of energy. In developing the Business Intelligence & Analytics framework, we have considered Design Science Research in information systems guidelines. We have designed a process for carrying out Design Science Research by describing the demarche to develop information artifacts, which are the essence of a Business Intelligence & Analytics system. The information artifacts, such as data source, preprocessed data, initial and final data model, as well as data visualizations, are designed and implemented in order to support clean and affordable energy data analysis. The proposed research model, applied for Romania in this paper, serves as a point of departure for investigating data in a more integrated way, and can be easily applied to another country case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Muntean & Doina Dănăiaţă & Luminiţa Hurbean & Cornelia Jude, 2021. "A Business Intelligence & Analytics Framework for Clean and Affordable Energy Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:638-:d:478433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/638/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/638/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihaela Muntean, 2018. "Business Intelligence Issues for Sustainability Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Adela BARA & Bogdan TUDORICA & Razvan Cristian MARALES, 2018. "Solutions for Big Data Processing and Analytics in Context of Smart Homes," Database Systems Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 80-89.
    3. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Anca Băndoi & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Elena Jianu, 2019. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): Implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Andrzej Raszkowski & Bartosz Bartniczak, 2019. "On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Simona-Vasilica Oprea & Adela Bâra & Bogdan George Tudorică & Gabriela Dobrița (Ene), 2020. "Sustainable Development with Smart Meter Data Analytics Using NoSQL and Self-Organizing Maps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Rafaela Hillerbrand, 2018. "Why Affordable Clean Energy Is Not Enough. A Capability Perspective on the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Yonglong Lu & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Martin Visbeck & Anne-Sophie Stevance, 2015. "Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7548), pages 432-433, April.
    8. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2020. "A Business Intelligence Framework for Analyzing Educational Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fatih Gurcan & Ahmet Ayaz & Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren & Mohammad Derawi, 2023. "Business Intelligence Strategies, Best Practices, and Latest Trends: Analysis of Scientometric Data from 2003 to 2023 Using Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Dello Strologo & Edoardo D’Andrassi & Niccolò Paoloni & Giorgia Mattei, 2021. "Italy versus Other European Countries: Sustainable Development Goals, Policies and Future Hypothetical Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-46, March.
    2. George H. Ionescu & Daniela Firoiu & Anca Tănasie & Tudor Sorin & Ramona Pîrvu & Alina Manta, 2020. "Assessing the Achievement of the SDG Targets for Health and Well-Being at EU Level by 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-38, July.
    3. Alejandra Boto-Álvarez & Roberto García-Fernández, 2020. "Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Carlos de Miguel Ramos & Rafael Laurenti, 2020. "Synergies and Trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals: The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Piotr Siemiątkowski & Patryk Tomaszewski & Joanna Marszałek-Kawa & Janusz Gierszewski, 2020. "The Financing of Renewable Energy Sources and the Level of Sustainable Development of Poland’s Provinces in the Area of Environmental Order," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    7. Monyei, Chukwuka G. & Akpeji, Kingsley O. & Oladeji, Olamide & Babatunde, Olubayo M. & Aholu, Okechukwu C. & Adegoke, Damilola & Imafidon, Justus O., 2022. "Regional cooperation for mitigating energy poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: A context-based approach through the tripartite lenses of access, sufficiency, and mobility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Xiao Xiao & Yue Cheng & Yuling Zhang, 2024. "Sustainable Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of the Impact of Policy Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Shannon L. Sibbald & Nicole Haggerty, 2019. "Integrating Business and Medical Pedagogy to Accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 92-101, March.
    10. Daniela Cristina Momete & Manuel Mihail Momete, 2021. "Map and Track the Performance in Education for Sustainable Development across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Zhi-Jiang Liu & Vera Snezhko & Anastasia Kurilova, 2022. "International legal instruments for stimulating green building and construction business: Russian case study," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 157-175, March.
    12. Jaros³aw Brodny & Magdalena Tutak, 2023. "The level of implementing sustainable development goal "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 47-102, March.
    13. Duong Cong Doanh & Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila & Le Thi Loan, 2021. "Antecedents of green purchase intention: a cross-cultural empirical evidence from Vietnam and Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 935-971, December.
    14. Marcin K. Widomski & Anna Musz-Pomorska, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in Poland since 2004 in the Light of Sustainability Indicators," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, February.
    15. Pedro-José Martínez-Córdoba & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Bernardino Benito & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2021. "The Commitment of Spanish Local Governments to Sustainable Development Goal 11 from a Multivariate Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Luca Coscieme & Caroline A. Ochieng & Charles Spillane & Ian Donohue, 2023. "Measuring policy coherence on global access to clean energy between European countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Stella D. Juventia & Sarah K. Jones & Marie-Angélique Laporte & Roseline Remans & Chiara Villani & Natalia Estrada-Carmona, 2020. "Text Mining National Commitments towards Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Jahar Bhowmik & Raaj Kishore Biswas & Nurjahan Ananna, 2020. "Women’s education and coverage of skilled birth attendance: An assessment of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 in the South and Southeast Asian Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Marco Nunes & António Abreu & Célia Saraiva, 2021. "A Model to Manage Cooperative Project Risks to Create Knowledge and Drive Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:638-:d:478433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.