IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p14059-d706699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Urban Green Public Spaces: The Case Study of Krasnodar Region Cities, Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Danilina

    (Urban Planning Department, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Yaroslavskoe sh. 26, 129337 Moscow, Russia)

  • Ksenia Tsurenkova

    (Urban Planning Department, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Yaroslavskoe sh. 26, 129337 Moscow, Russia)

  • Vladislav Berkovich

    (Urban Planning Department, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Yaroslavskoe sh. 26, 129337 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The 21st century challenges, in particular those of climate change, population growth, air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic global health crisis, demand greater emphasis on infrastructure facilities capable of keeping pace with population needs in well-being, health and economic prosperity. Green infrastructure aimed to intensify ecological processes in built-up areas and deliver vital ecosystem services is of a key significance for Russia, one of the most urbanized countries in the world. The article is dedicated to the issue of providing cities sustainability through creating a basic element of the urban green infrastructure—a public green network—by incorporating and linking a variety of already existing urban environmental components, both spatial and linear, such as natural areas, squares, parks, streets, boulevards, embankments and others. The territory of the case study is Krasnodar region located in the southwestern part of the North Caucasus, the warmest region of Russia characterized by highly varied urban areas. The authors propose the multiple criteria method for evaluating the existing GreenPS and creating a GreenPS framework for six cities located in Krasnodar region both on the southern seaward part and on the northern steppe part. This approach is focused on the sustainable development of the cities, adaptation to climate change and the prevention of local risks with respect to the preservation of ecosystem functions and cultural heritage. The methodology includes three stages: investigating and evaluating the present state of the existing urban GreenPS; defining sustainability potential; and the submission of master plan proposals for the improvement and further development and management of the GreenPS network implementing nature-based solutions. In addition, it follows seven main integral criteria, namely, Accessibility, Density, Sufficiency, Continuity, Diversity, Value and Clean and Sanitary, illustrated by ray diagrams. The results of the study show good potential for construction in Krasnodar region cities of an efficient GreenPS network integrating ecological and social city components. The flexibility of the method proposed makes it replicable for any other city aimed at creating a GreenPS network in sustainable, climate-change-adapted cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Danilina & Ksenia Tsurenkova & Vladislav Berkovich, 2021. "Evaluating Urban Green Public Spaces: The Case Study of Krasnodar Region Cities, Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:14059-:d:706699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/14059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/14059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Urban and Suburban Green," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Wanshu Wu & Ziying Ma & Jinhan Guo & Xinyi Niu & Kai Zhao, 2022. "Evaluating the Effects of Built Environment on Street Vitality at the City Level: An Empirical Research Based on Spatial Panel Durbin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:14059-:d:706699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.