IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13927-d704210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Prevalence of Protective Measure Adoption in Mosques during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Choirul Amin

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta 57162, Indonesia)

  • Priyono Priyono

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta 57162, Indonesia)

  • Umrotun Umrotun

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta 57162, Indonesia)

  • Maulida Fatkhiyah

    (Faculty of Geography, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta 57162, Indonesia)

  • Suliadi Firdaus Sufahani

    (Faculty of Sciences Technology and Human Development, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Muslims worship together more frequently than members of other religions. They pray in congregation at the mosque five times a day, causing the mosque to become a central hub for COVID-19 transmission. Therefore, the adoption of protective measures as a method of mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic in mosques is vital. This study aims to account for the implementation status of protective measures in mosques in Surakarta City, Indonesia, during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire sent to mosque caretakers as research participants. The mosques were chosen using a simple random sampling technique for a total sample of 247 mosques in Surakarta City. Participants were asked how often they implement the following protective measures in mosques, as recommended by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia: checking body temperature before entering the mosque, prayer distancing, carrying own prayer mat, wearing a mask when praying and no handshaking after prayer. The prevalence of the adoption of protective measures was revealed to be amongst 44.6% to 92.6%, with the lowest prevalence in checking body temperature before entering the mosque. Overall, only 33.7% of mosques implemented all protective measures. In mosques affiliated with Nahdlatul Ulama and the small mosques, the prevalence of protective measures was lower than in mosques affiliated with Muhammadiyah and the large mosques, respectively, suggesting that it is crucial to develop targeted health messages for these groups. Finally, as religious communities remain active in congregational worship during the outbreak, the contradictions between medical and religious practices must be addressed in society for believers to adopt public health policies and for policymakers to comprehend the importance of religious observances.

Suggested Citation

  • Choirul Amin & Priyono Priyono & Umrotun Umrotun & Maulida Fatkhiyah & Suliadi Firdaus Sufahani, 2021. "Exploring the Prevalence of Protective Measure Adoption in Mosques during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13927-:d:704210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jumadi Jumadi & Vidya N. Fikriyah & Hamim Z. Hadibasyir & Muhammad I. T. Sunariya & Kuswaji D. Priyono & Noor A. Setiyadi & Steve J. Carver & Paul D. Norman & Nick S. Malleson & Arif Rohman & Aynaz Lo, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Accessibility of COVID-19 Healthcare Facilities in Jakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Jumadi Jumadi & Fikriyah Vidya N. & Hadibasyir Hamim Zaky & Priyono Kuswaji Dwi & Musiyam Muhammad & Mardiah Andri N. R. & Rohman Arif & Hasyim Hamzah & Ibrahim Mohd. Hairy, 2022. "A Year of Spatio-Temporal Clusters of COVID-19 in Indonesia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(2), pages 139-151, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13927-:d:704210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.