IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13299-d692597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Response of an Estuarine Nekton Community to Coastal Wetland Habitat Restoration

Author

Listed:
  • Richard D. Mahoney

    (Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA
    Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

  • Jeffrey L. Beal

    (Ducks Unlimited Inc., Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Marine and Estuarine Subsection, Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA)

  • Dakota M. Lewis

    (Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
    School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA)

  • Geoffrey S. Cook

    (Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

Abstract

Globally coastal habitats are experiencing degradation and threatening the production of critical ecosystem services such as shoreline stabilization, water filtration, and nursery grounds for marine fauna. To combat the loss of these ecosystem services, resource managers are actively restoring coastal habitats. This study compares samples collected from non-restored sites, sites restored in 2011, and sites that underwent restoration in 2019. Restoration sites are impacted wetlands with high elevation mounds that were leveled to increase the areal extent of intertidal habitats, enabling the recruitment of intertidal flora and fauna. Fyke nets were used to sample nekton within the upper intertidal zone. To quantify restoration success, nekton abundance, biomass, diversity, and indicator species were quantified. Sites restored in 2011 had a greater abundance compared to non-restored sites. Common snook, clown gobies, silversides, juvenile mullet, and Gulf killifishes were indicator species at successfully restored sites, while salinity, site type, and Secchi depth played important roles in predicting abundance and diversity. These findings are consistent with recent studies suggesting it can take years to see quantifiable differences in nekton communities following habitat restoration. Additionally, this work provides new insight regarding the benefits of restoring coastal wetland elevation to maximize intertidal habitat, thereby positively impacting nekton communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard D. Mahoney & Jeffrey L. Beal & Dakota M. Lewis & Geoffrey S. Cook, 2021. "Quantifying the Response of an Estuarine Nekton Community to Coastal Wetland Habitat Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13299-:d:692597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13299-:d:692597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.