IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13248-d691440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Emitter Modifications on Spray Performance of a Solid Set Canopy Delivery System in a High-Density Apple Orchard

Author

Listed:
  • Rakesh Ranjan

    (Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA
    Freshwater Institute, The Conservation Fund, Shepherdstown, WV 25443, USA)

  • Rajeev Sinha

    (Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA)

  • Lav R. Khot

    (Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA)

  • Gwen-Alyn Hoheisel

    (Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA)

  • Matthew J. Grieshop

    (Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lancing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Mark Ledebuhr

    (Application Insight, LLC, Lansing, MI 48906, USA)

Abstract

Optimally configured solid set canopy delivery systems (SSCDS) can provide adequate spray performance in high-density apple orchards with a minimized risk of off-target pesticide drift. SSCDS configured in a shower-down emitter arrangement have been reported to be the simplest and most economical system. However, existing off-the-shelf emitters used in shower-down configurations have resulted in minimal deposition in lower canopy zones. Therefore, this study was focused on the modifications of off-the-shelf emitters to obtain a desirable spray pattern for adequate spray deposition in all the canopy zones. The modifications include redesigning the impact plate of two existing micro-emitters. Field tests were conducted to evaluate the spray performance of SSCDS with the non-modified emitters (treatment: SD1 and SD3) and contrast the results with modified emitters (treatment: SD2 and SD4). While the treatments SD1 and SD3 had off-the-shelf emitters with swivel plate and static spreader, respectively, the treatment SD2 and SD4 had similar emitters with modified impactor plates. In each treatment block, the apple canopy was divided into six zones and sprayed with a 500 ppm fluorescent tracer solution. Mylar cards and water-sensitive paper samplers were placed on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces in each canopy zone to quantify spray deposition and coverage, respectively. The SSCDS treatments retrofitted with modified emitters, i.e., SD2 and SD4, were observed to have uniform and numerically higher deposition and coverage compared to SD1 and SD3. The SSCDS treatment with modified static spreader (i.e., SD4) resulted in the highest overall spray deposition (1405.7 ± 156.4 ng cm −2 [mean ± standard error]) with improved mid (1121.6 ± 186.9 ng cm −2 ) and bottom (895.6 ± 149.3 ng cm −2 ) canopy deposition. Overall, the proposed emitter modification assisted in improved SSCDS spray performances and may be a way forward toward large-scale emplacements of such systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rakesh Ranjan & Rajeev Sinha & Lav R. Khot & Gwen-Alyn Hoheisel & Matthew J. Grieshop & Mark Ledebuhr, 2021. "Effect of Emitter Modifications on Spray Performance of a Solid Set Canopy Delivery System in a High-Density Apple Orchard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13248-:d:691440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramesh K. Sahni & Rakesh Ranjan & Lav R. Khot & Gwen-Alyn Hoheisel & Matthew J. Grieshop, 2022. "Reservoir Units Optimization in Pneumatic Spray Delivery-Based Fixed Spray System for Large-Scale Commercial Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13248-:d:691440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.