IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12093-d670470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on Crack Propagation of Rock by Blasting under Bidirectional Equal Confining Pressure Load

Author

Listed:
  • Jinjin Ge

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Ying Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Wei Huang

    (School of Architecture and Art, Huainan United University, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Haibo Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Rongzhou Yang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Zhongyi Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

Abstract

Rock blasting during tunneling has shown that the rock failure in high in situ stress environments is different from that in low in situ stress conditions or with a shallow rock mass. In particular, the propagation direction of the main crack induced by blasting is greatly affected by the in situ stresses. In order to study the law of crack propagation in rock during blasting under the conditions of an initial in situ stress, a transparent material that conformed to the mechanical properties of hard rock was used to carry out a similar model rock blasting test, under a unidirectional load. The results show that initial stress has a great influence on the propagation number, length, and direction of the main radial cracks. The specific performances were as follows: under the action of an equal confining pressure load, the longest main radial crack in the model specimen propagated along the diagonal direction, and the number and length of the main radial cracks propagated decreased with the gradual increase of confining pressure stress; in addition, the diameter of the circumferential cracks also decreased with the increase of stress, and there was a negative correlation between them. In view of the phenomenon where the longest main radial crack propagated along the diagonal direction in the model test, a mechanical model was established in this study to explain this process. This is of practical significance for understanding the mechanism of rock fracture when blasting with high in situ stresses.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinjin Ge & Ying Xu & Wei Huang & Haibo Wang & Rongzhou Yang & Zhongyi Zhang, 2021. "Experimental Study on Crack Propagation of Rock by Blasting under Bidirectional Equal Confining Pressure Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12093-:d:670470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Huang & Zhaojian Hu & Chenlong Zhang & Zhijun Pan & Jie Hu & Xinpeng Chen, 2022. "Deformation Characteristics and Damage Assessment of Prefabricated Frame Tunnels after Central and External Explosions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Rongjian Pan & Peiyu Wang & Zilong Zhou & Riyan Lan & Lu Chen & Hongquan Yang & Cuigang Chen & Jinkun Zhang & Yang Liu, 2023. "Effects of Confining Stress on Blast-Induced Damage Distribution of Rock with Discontinuity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12093-:d:670470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.