IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11830-d665126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional Compaction (CC) and Intelligent Compaction (IC) Methods of Asphalt Pavement Overlay

Author

Listed:
  • Mithil Mazumder

    (Department of Engineering Technology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

  • Jihyeon Yun

    (Department of Engineering Technology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

  • Soon-Jae Lee

    (Department of Engineering Technology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

  • Kyu-Dong Jeong

    (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang 10223, Korea)

Abstract

The use of intelligent compaction (IC) in asphalt overlay includes the use of double-drum IC rollers, a roller measurement system, global position system (GPS) radio/receiver/base station, infrared temperature sensors, and an onboard computer reporting system. GPS based mapping and optional feedback control help to overcome the drawbacks associated with conventional compaction such as identifying soft spots, achieving consistent roller patterns, and monitoring asphalt surface temperature and levels of compaction with adequate quality control or quality assurance (QC/QA). Cost-effectiveness of both compaction types was measured in terms of initial and roadway lifecycle cost based on the cost inputs received from South Korea and other published literatures. Roadway lifecycle cost was reported based on the improvement in in-place density, smoothness, and fatigue life. The results of this study showed that: (1) with IC an approximate 4.1% initial cost reduction can be achieved compared to conventional compaction; (2) QC/QA cost is found to have the most significant effect on the higher initial cost of conventional compaction compared to other associated costs whereas intelligent roller cost is the vital cost category for IC; (3) improvement of in-place air voids and density due to the IC has shown that at 97% field density (or at 3% air void content) the State Highway Agency can save approximately 44% over a 20-year service period; and (4) agency cost is observed to be reduced by approximately 62% with the IC method based on the 25-year analysis period due to the increase in fatigue life.

Suggested Citation

  • Mithil Mazumder & Jihyeon Yun & Soon-Jae Lee & Kyu-Dong Jeong, 2021. "Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional Compaction (CC) and Intelligent Compaction (IC) Methods of Asphalt Pavement Overlay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11830-:d:665126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11830-:d:665126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.