IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11561-d660280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of an Innovative Solution for the Interruption of 3-D Point Thermal Bridges in Buildings on Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Rastislav Ingeli

    (Department of Building Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinského 11, 813 68 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Gašparík

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinského 11, 813 68 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Lucia Paulovičová

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinského 11, 813 68 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

During the design of the external cladding, it is possible to use different materials and compositions. One of these possibilities is also a ventilated facade, which consists of a supporting structure, a thermal insulation, a supporting grid, an air gap for ventilation and a cladding layer. The construction of the supporting grid in the ventilated facade must be mechanically anchored into the supporting structure of the external cladding. This mechanical anchoring causes 3-D point thermal bridges in the external cladding itself. Therefore, the aim of this work is to assess and analyze the influence of these 3-D point thermal bridges on transmission heat losses through the external cladding. A Finite Element Mesh analysis has been used for this analysis. Different types of external cladding compositions were modeled in the simulation program, and the effect on the heat transfer coefficient was determined. In addition to the analysis of the existing anchoring systems, an innovative solution has been suggested that is more economical and easier to implement. The results show that the application of anchors and their number impacts significantly on the thermal properties of the envelope. The difference between the anchoring element with a thermal insulation pad and the patented method is minimal. This is a 1.29% difference. The last variant was a proposal (patent) that the anchoring element is only plastic-coated and thus its thermal engineering properties are improved, which is manifested mainly in heat conduction but also from the radiant point of view, as plasticizing the emissivity changes. Compared to the perimeter cladding without the ap-plication of an anchoring element, the heat loss increases by 29.37%. In addition to the energy savings, there are also financial savings. While the plastic pads costs about EUR 0.3, the plastic coating (patent) represents a price of around EUR 0.03. If we had a building with 10,000 m 2 of wall area where 6 pieces of anchors per 1 m 2 are applied, the savings would be EUR 16,200. Such savings are already significant. The conclusion of this work is that these point thermal bridges have a significant impact on the overall transmission heat loss coefficient and therefore they have overall heat demand and energy demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Rastislav Ingeli & Jozef Gašparík & Lucia Paulovičová, 2021. "Impact of an Innovative Solution for the Interruption of 3-D Point Thermal Bridges in Buildings on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11561-:d:660280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Kalús & Veronika Mučková & Daniela Koudelková & Mária Kurčová & Zuzana Straková & Martin Sokol & Rastislav Ingeli & Patrik Šťastný & Peter Janík, 2023. "Contribution to Active Thermal Protection Research—Part 2 Verification by Experimental Measurement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-33, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11561-:d:660280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.