IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11239-d654390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of Properties of Soil–Rock Mixture Prepared by the Laboratory Vibration Compaction Method

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoping Ji

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Honglei Lu

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Cong Dai

    (Institute of Transportation Development Strategy & Planning of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Yonggen Ye

    (Hangzhou Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310007, China)

  • Zhifei Cui

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yue Xiong

    (Engineering Department, China Highway Engineering Consultants Corporation, Beijing 100089, China)

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the properties of soil–rock mixtures (SRM) prepared by the vibration compaction method. First, the results of laboratory experiments and field tests are compared to determine the reasonable parameters of the vibration compaction method (VCM) for soil–rock mixtures. The compaction characteristics, CBR, and resilient modulus of the laboratory-prepared soil–rock mixtures by the static pressure compaction method (SPCM) and vibration compaction method are compared. The effects of the soil to rock ratio and the maximum particle size and gradation on the compaction characteristic, resilient modulus and CBR of soil–rock mixtures prepared by the vibration compaction method are investigated. Finally, field measurements are subsequently conducted to validate the laboratory investigations. The results show that the reasonable vibration frequency, exciting force, and static surface pressure of the vibration compactor for soil–rock mixtures are recommended as 25 Hz, 5.3 kN, and 154.0~163.2 kPa, respectively. Soil–rock mixtures prepared by vibration compaction method has smaller optimum water content and gradation variation and larger density than specimens prepared by the static pressure compaction method, and the CBR and resilient modulus are 1.46 ± 0.02 and 1.16 ± 0.03 times those of specimens prepared by the static pressure compaction method, respectively. The ratio of soil to rock, followed by the maximum particle size, lead obvious influences on the properties of soil–rock mixtures. Moreover, the results show that the CBR and resilient modulus of soil–rock mixtures prepared by vibration compaction method have a correlation of 86.9% and 89.1% with the field tests, respectively, which is higher than the static pressure compaction method.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoping Ji & Honglei Lu & Cong Dai & Yonggen Ye & Zhifei Cui & Yue Xiong, 2021. "Characterization of Properties of Soil–Rock Mixture Prepared by the Laboratory Vibration Compaction Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11239-:d:654390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingjun Jiang & Hongwei Lin & Zhanchuang Han & Changqing Deng, 2019. "Fatigue Properties of Cold-Recycled Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Fabricated by Different Compaction Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Faizan Husain & Issam I. A. Qamhia & Abhilash Vyas & Renan Santos Maia & Erol Tutumluer & Ramez Hajj, 2023. "Emulsion Mixtures of Fractionated Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement and Quarry By-Products: A Laboratory Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11239-:d:654390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.