IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9167-d615211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NBS Impact Evaluation with GREENPASS Methodology Shown by the Case Study ‘Fischbeker Höfe’ in Hamburg/Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Scharf

    (Institute of Soil Bioengineering and Landscape Construction, University of Life Science and Natural Resources, 1190 Vienna, Austria
    Green4Cities GmbH, 1180 Vienna, Austria
    GREENPASS GmbH, 1180 Vienna, Austria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Martha Kogler

    (Green4Cities GmbH, 1180 Vienna, Austria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Florian Kraus

    (Green4Cities GmbH, 1180 Vienna, Austria
    GREENPASS GmbH, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Igone Garcia Perez

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160 Derio, Spain
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, ICAI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Laura Gutierrez Garcia

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160 Derio, Spain)

Abstract

The implementation of nature-based solutions (NBS) in urban regeneration aims to improve citizens’ health and well-being. Therefore, tools need to be applied to identify the most suitable and efficient location and type of NBS. Within the CLEVER-cities H2020 project, the Greenpass method has been chosen to evaluate different design solutions regarding thermal comfort and physiological equivalent temperature (PET), energy, water and air fluxes. The Greenpass system comprises of standardized tools, reports and a unique set of Key Performance Score (KPS) and Key Performance Indicators (KPI). This paper deals with the impact assessment of NBS by the use of the innovative Greenpass system for the CLEVER-cities project ‘Fischbeker Höfe’ in Hamburg, Germany to ensure human health and well-being improvements for the citizens. To that end and considering the climate change context, thermal comfort is a KPI with high relevance in terms of the NBS co-benefits. Based on the PET within a project area Greenpass calculates the Thermal Comfort Score (TCS). The share of the different PET classes within the project area is multiplied with a weighting factor and summarized to the TCS. The results of the climate resilience analysis of the urban development area ‘Fischbeker Höfe’ in Hamburg are presented and discussed in comparison to a conventional architecture that disregards NBS, showing improvement with regards to four out of five KPS. Based on the evaluation results, advice is given to the co-creative design team on how to further improve the design towards climate resilience. The Greenpass system has proven to be a powerful and tailored tool to support climate resilient urban design and architecture. It provides a standardized and comprehensible but still scientific basis for decisions in a highly efficient and understandable way.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Scharf & Martha Kogler & Florian Kraus & Igone Garcia Perez & Laura Gutierrez Garcia, 2021. "NBS Impact Evaluation with GREENPASS Methodology Shown by the Case Study ‘Fischbeker Höfe’ in Hamburg/Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9167-:d:615211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Ma & Tiantian Zhou & Shuo Lei & Yali Wen & Theint Theint Htun, 2019. "Effects of urban green spaces on residents’ well-being," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2793-2809, December.
    2. Alessandro Arlati & Anne Rödl & Sopho Kanjaria-Christian & Jörg Knieling, 2021. "Stakeholder Participation in the Planning and Design of Nature-Based Solutions. Insights from CLEVER Cities Project in Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Binyi Liu & Zefeng Lian & Robert D. Brown, 2019. "Effect of Landscape Microclimates on Thermal Comfort and Physiological Wellbeing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria João Salvador Costa & Alexandra Leitão & Rosa Silva & Vanessa Monteiro & Pedro Melo, 2022. "Climate Change Prevention through Community Actions and Empowerment: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-37, November.
    2. Zhang Jingchao & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2021. "Are societies becoming proself? A topographical difference under fast urbanization in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 12976-12993, September.
    3. Zhengsong Lin & Yuting Wang & Xinyue Ye & Yuxi Wan & Tianjun Lu & Yu Han, 2022. "Effects of Low-Carbon Visualizations in Landscape Design Based on Virtual Eye-Movement Behavior Preference," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Zefeng Lian & Binyi Liu & Robert D. Brown, 2023. "Exploring the Predictive Potential of Physiological Measures of Human Thermal Strain in Outdoor Environments in Hot and Humid Areas in Summer—A Case Study of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Jingming Qian & Shujiang Miao & Nigel Tapper & Jianguang Xie & Greg Ingleton, 2020. "Investigation on Airport Landscape Cooling Associated with Irrigation: A Case Study of Adelaide Airport, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Pritam Ahirrao & Smita Khan, 2022. "Evaluating public open spaces through the lively planning integrative perspective: a developing country context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5225-5257, April.
    7. Yavuz Alkan, 2021. "User-focused alternative design model for Sarıçay channel and landscaping in terms of sports and health components: Çanakkale, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7212-7229, May.
    8. Nikola Žižlavská & Tomáš Mikita & Zdeněk Patočka, 2021. "The Effects of Roadside Woody Vegetation on the Surface Temperature of Cycle Paths," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Zahra Mokhtari & Shahindokht Barghjelveh & Romina Sayahnia & Salman Qureshi & Alessio Russo, 2022. "Dynamic and Heterogeneity of Urban Heat Island: A Theoretical Framework in the Context of Urban Ecology," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Manca Dremel & Barbara Goličnik Marušić & Igor Zelnik, 2023. "Defining Natural Habitat Types as Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Živa Ravnikar & Alfonso Bahillo & Barbara Goličnik Marušić, 2023. "A Protocol for Microclimate-Related Street Assessment and the Potential of Detailed Environmental Data for Better Consideration of Microclimatology in Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Jiang Li & Qiao Pan & You Peng & Tao Feng & Shaobo Liu & Xiaoxi Cai & Chixing Zhong & Yicheng Yin & Wenbo Lai, 2020. "Perceived Quality of Urban Wetland Parks: A Second-Order Factor Structure Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Kenneth Y. T. Lim & Minh Anh Nguyen Duc & Minh Tuan Nguyen Thien & Rajamanickam Yuvaraj & Jack S. Fogarty, 2022. "Investigating the Effects of Microclimate on Physiological Stress and Brain Function with Data Science and Wearables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    14. Dawou Joung & Bum-Jin Park & Shinkwang Kang, 2022. "Quality of Life and Mental Health Benefits of Public Participation in Forest Conservation Activities in Urban Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Anna Biasin & Mauro Masiero & Giulia Amato & Davide Pettenella, 2023. "Nature-Based Solutions Modeling and Cost-Benefit Analysis to Face Climate Change Risks in an Urban Area: The Case of Turin (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-32, January.
    16. Xuefei Wang & Zhiqi Chen & Dawei Ma & Tingting Zhou & Jintang Chen & Xing Jiang, 2023. "Relationship between Visual and Thermal Comfort and Electrodermal Activity in Campus Blue–Green Spaces: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Michael Gräf & Markus Immitzer & Peter Hietz & Rosemarie Stangl, 2021. "Water-Stressed Plants Do Not Cool: Leaf Surface Temperature of Living Wall Plants under Drought Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Wendel Henrique Baumgartner, 2021. "Parque Augusta (São Paulo/Brazil): From the Struggles of a Social Movement to Its Appropriation in the Real Estate Market and the Right to Nature in the City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Elmira Nasri Roodsari & Parian Hoseini, 2022. "An assessment of the correlation between urban green space supply and socio-economic disparities of Tehran districts—Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12867-12882, November.
    20. Jingmei Li & Shaofei Yu & Zhihua Xu, 2023. "Does environmental pollution weaken the positive effect of government public expenditure on residents’ subjective well-being? A case study in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(4), pages 927-945, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9167-:d:615211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.