IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8493-d604365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Disciplinary Composition on Virtual Learning Group Process Dynamics: Students’ Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Melinda Dincă

    (Department of Sociology, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Anca Luștrea

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University Clinic of Therapies and Psycho-Pedagogical Counseling, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Atalia Onițiu

    (Department of Sociology, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Mariana Crașovan

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University Clinic of Therapies and Psycho-Pedagogical Counseling, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Trond Berge

    (Department of Social Anthropology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Høgskoleringen 1, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

This research was conducted as a collaborative project between the West University of Timișoara (Romania) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway) to develop a transnational learning activity. The students learned in virtual collaborative study groups; developed project-based teams; shared experiences, skills, and professional competencies; and collaborated directly with their teachers, the researchers, and the labor force. Three virtual learning groups of undergraduate students ( N = 131), presenting comparable course descriptors and disciplinary group compositions, participated in the study. This study aimed to determine the effects of disciplinary composition on virtual learning group process dynamics from the students’ perspectives. This study applied a quasi-experimental between-subjects study design: quantitative methods were used to validate a research instrument and to determine statistical differences in the group process dynamic between the three groups; a qualitative method was applied to identify an in-depth understanding of the students’ perception about the group learning experience. By analyzing the group dynamics in the three settings—mono-disciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and cross-cultural—the research results show the advantages of each virtual learning composition in the group dynamic and learning outcomes in terms of group skill acquisitions. The conclusions can help teachers design virtual team compositions, a crucial stage in ensuring the achievement of desired learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Melinda Dincă & Anca Luștrea & Atalia Onițiu & Mariana Crașovan & Trond Berge, 2021. "The Effects of Disciplinary Composition on Virtual Learning Group Process Dynamics: Students’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8493-:d:604365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8493-:d:604365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.