IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7166-d582550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distribution and Integration of Military Settlements’ Cultural Heritage in the Large Pass City of the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty: A Case Study of Juyong Pass Defense Area

Author

Listed:
  • Yukun Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China
    Key Laboratory of Department of Culture and Tourism of Information Technology of Architectural Heritage Inheritance, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Songyang Li

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China
    Key Laboratory of Department of Culture and Tourism of Information Technology of Architectural Heritage Inheritance, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Lifeng Tan

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China
    Key Laboratory of Department of Culture and Tourism of Information Technology of Architectural Heritage Inheritance, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jiayin Zhou

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China
    Key Laboratory of Department of Culture and Tourism of Information Technology of Architectural Heritage Inheritance, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

The Great Wall of China is more than a wall: it is an extensive cultural route. Pass cities, which are usually large defensive fortresses overseeing an entire fortified area, are an essential part of this heritage and are at the core of the Great Wall’s defense system. Juyong Pass was the closest Pass city to Beijing during the Ming Dynasty when the Great Wall reached its peak. It consisted of five regions—south, east, north, west, and central—that form three fortification levels: core castle, Bao city, and End facility. Based on the Juyong defense area military settlements database, this paper applied spatial analysis methods and found that more than half of the military’s resources for the whole defense area were focused on the western part of the wall, which formed another military core alongside Juyong Pass city. However, the current conservation strategy only focuses on Juyong Pass itself, neglecting the settlements in the western part, thereby destroying the integrity of the Great Wall’s heritage. By clarifying the distribution of cultural heritage in this area, we hope to encourage the preservation of many fortifications according to their authentic historical sphere of control and provide a reference for the sustainable integration of resources along the significant cultural routes of the Great Wall.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukun Zhang & Songyang Li & Lifeng Tan & Jiayin Zhou, 2021. "Distribution and Integration of Military Settlements’ Cultural Heritage in the Large Pass City of the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty: A Case Study of Juyong Pass Defense Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7166-:d:582550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuang Zhao & Diechuan Yang & Chi Gao, 2023. "Identifying Landscape Character for Large Linear Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall in Ji-Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Dan He & Zixuan Chen & Shaowei Ai & Jing Zhou & Linlin Lu & Ting Yang, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Urban Cultural and Entertainment Facilities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7166-:d:582550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.