IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3621-d352504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small-Scale Variation in Nitrogen Use Efficiency Parameters in Winter Wheat as Affected by N Fertilization and Tillage Intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth-Maria Hausherr Lüder

    (Department of Environmental Systems Science (D-USYS), Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Ruijun Qin

    (Hermiston Agricultural Research & Extension Center, Oregon State University, 2121 South 1st Street, Hermiston, OR 97838, USA)

  • Walter Richner

    (Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Peter Stamp

    (Department of Environmental Systems Science (D-USYS), Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Bernhard Streit

    (School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

  • Juan Manuel Herrera

    (Agroscope, Institut des sciences en production végétale IPV, Route de Duillier 50, P.O. Box 1012, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland)

  • Christos Noulas

    (Institute of Industrial and Forage Crops, Hellenic Agricultural Organization–“DEMETER”, 41335 Larissa, Greece)

Abstract

Limited information exists on how tillage and nitrogen (N) fertilization affects small-scale variation in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and crop performance. In a two-year field study under temperate conditions, we investigated how tillage (NT, no-tillage; CT, conventional tillage) and N fertilization affected the small-scale variation in NUE and winter wheat performance (grain yield, G w ; grain protein concentration, GPC). A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Within each tillage plot (12 × 35 m 2 ), N rates (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 kg N ha −1 ) were completely randomized within each of four groups of microplots (1.5 × 1.5 m 2 ). Early-season soil mineral N (N min ) was also monitored in both years. At rates < 150 kg N ha −1 , NT was not competitive with CT in terms of G w and NUE. G w and aboveground plant N were not correlated with N min prior to application of N fertilizer. NT usually led to larger spatial heterogeneity of N min , G w , and NUE. The small-scale variability of G w , GPC, NUE, and N supply decreased with increasing N fertilization rates under both tillage systems. Significant increases in G w and GPC were observed with increasing N rates, whereas NUE decreased slightly with increasing N rates in both NT and CT. The overall moderate spatial variation in N min , G w , and NUE did not justify site-specific N fertilization in these small fields, with the exception of the stony within-plot positions, which were not responsive to rates of N > 50 kg N ha −1 .

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth-Maria Hausherr Lüder & Ruijun Qin & Walter Richner & Peter Stamp & Bernhard Streit & Juan Manuel Herrera & Christos Noulas, 2020. "Small-Scale Variation in Nitrogen Use Efficiency Parameters in Winter Wheat as Affected by N Fertilization and Tillage Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3621-:d:352504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sajid Masood & Muhammad Suleman & Sajid Hussain & Muhammad Jamil & Muhammad Ashraf & Manzer H. Siddiqui & Rizwan Nazar & Naseerullah Khan & Sarvet Jehan & Khalid Saifullah Khan & Muhammad Tahir, 2023. "Fertilizers Containing Balanced Proportions of NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N Enhance Maize ( Zea mays L.) Yield Due to Improved Nitrogen Recovery Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3621-:d:352504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.