IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10256-d458871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward Regeneration of Public Open Spaces within Large Housing Estates–A Case Study of Niš, Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Bogdanović Protić

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18106 Niš, Serbia)

  • Petar Mitković

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18106 Niš, Serbia)

  • Ljiljana Vasilevska

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18106 Niš, Serbia)

Abstract

Despite the multiple contributions of public open spaces (POSs) to the quality of life in large housing estates (LHEs), the comprehensive treatment of their improvement has so far been a rare occasion in post-socialist countries. This paper aimed to explore the transformations of POSs in inherited LHEs in the socialist and post-socialist period and the potential for their regeneration. The investigation was based on a comparative analysis of two case studies in Niš, Serbia, which represent typical modes of POS devastation. The performed research study has shown that POSs have succumbed to dilapidation, displaying a wide array of problems and that their regeneration is neglected. The paper proposes a comprehensive set of measures to regenerate POSs based on contemporary concepts of urban planning and design with a special focus on long-term actions and residents’ needs. Particular importance is given to establishing the development guidelines as future prerequisites for overcoming current institutional, economic, legislative, and social obstacles for sustainable implementation of regeneration measures. These findings might encourage future studies of creating a model option for improving POSs at the city of Nis scale, as well in other Serbian cities towards sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Bogdanović Protić & Petar Mitković & Ljiljana Vasilevska, 2020. "Toward Regeneration of Public Open Spaces within Large Housing Estates–A Case Study of Niš, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10256-:d:458871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltán Kovács & Günter Herfert, 2012. "Development Pathways of Large Housing Estates in Post-socialist Cities: An International Comparison," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 324-342.
    2. Daniela Gasperi & Giuseppina Pennisi & Niccolò Rizzati & Francesca Magrefi & Giovanni Bazzocchi & Umberto Mezzacapo & Monique Centrone Stefani & Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianq, 2016. "Towards Regenerated and Productive Vacant Areas through Urban Horticulture: Lessons from Bologna, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews & Richard Sendi, 2001. "Large Housing Estates In Slovenia: A Framework For Renewal," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 233-255.
    4. Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews & Richard Sendi, 2001. "Large Housing Estates In Slovenia: A Framework For Renewal," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 233-255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ & Svetlana K. Perović, 2021. "Demolition-Based Urban Regeneration from a Post-Socialist Perspective: Case Study of a Neighborhood in Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Abdullah Addas & Ahmad Maghrabi, 2021. "Social Evaluation of Public Open Space Services and Their Impact on Well-Being: A Micro-Scale Assessment from a Coastal University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Eliza Szczerek, 2021. "The Problem of Densification of Large-Panel Housing Estates upon the Example of Cracow," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Josef Navrátil & Petr Klusáček & Stanislav Martinát & Petr Dvořák, 2021. "Emergence of Centralized (Collective) and Decentralized (Individual) Environmentally Friendly Solutions during the Regeneration of a Residential Building in a Post-Socialist City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ & Svetlana K. Perović, 2021. "Demolition-Based Urban Regeneration from a Post-Socialist Perspective: Case Study of a Neighborhood in Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Maciej Piekarski & Łukasz Bajda & Ewelina Gotkowska, 2021. "Transformation of Socialist Realistic Residential Architecture into a Contemporary Sustainable Housing Habitat—General Approach and the Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2021. "The Evolution of Multifamily Housing: Post-Second World War Large Housing Estates versus Post-Socialist Multifamily Housing Types in Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Christoph D. D. Rupprecht, 2017. "Informal Urban Green Space: Residents’ Perception, Use, and Management Preferences across Four Major Japanese Shrinking Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Donata Wysocka & Jadwiga Biegańska & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska, 2021. "Construction Activity as an Element of Suburban Zone Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Agnieszka Dawidowicz & Małgorzata Dudzińska, 2022. "The Potential of GIS Tools for Diagnosing the SFS of Multi-Family Housing towards Friendly Cities—A Case Study of the EU Member State of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, May.
    7. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    8. Antoni F. Tulla & Ana Vera, 2019. "Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Daniela Gasperi & Nicola Michelon & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Ponchia & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2018. "Eco-Efficiency Assessment and Food Security Potential of Home Gardening: A Case Study in Padua, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Krzysztof Herman & Madalina Sbarcea & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2018. "Creating Green Space Sustainability through Low-Budget and Upcycling Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Philip Cooke, 2021. "After the Contagion. Ghost City Centres: Closed “Smart” or Open Greener?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Giulia Lucertini & Gianmarco Di Giustino, 2021. "Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture as a Tool for Food Security and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: The Case of Mestre," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Rupprecht, Christoph, 2017. "Informal urban green space: Residents’ perception, use, and management preferences across four major Japanese shrinking cities," SocArXiv ug86b, Center for Open Science.
    14. Martina Artmann & Katharina Sartison, 2018. "The Role of Urban Agriculture as a Nature-Based Solution: A Review for Developing a Systemic Assessment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-32, June.
    15. Chethika Gunasiri Wadumestrige Dona & Geetha Mohan & Kensuke Fukushi, 2021. "Promoting Urban Agriculture and Its Opportunities and Challenges—A Global Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. KubešCDFMR Jan, 2013. "European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 19(19), pages 19-43, June.
    17. Köse İstemi Alp & Kauškale Linda, 2020. "The Analysis of Urban Planning Aspects and Development of Residential Real Estate in Tallinn, Estonia," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 208-226, January.
    18. Jesus Ochoa & Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Kathrin Specht & Juan A. Fernández & Sebastián Bañón & Francesco Orsini & Francesca Magrefi & Giovanni Bazzocchi & Severin Halder & Doerte Martens & Noemi Kappel &, 2019. "Sustainable Community Gardens Require Social Engagement and Training: A Users’ Needs Analysis in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2018. "Revisiting the Sustainability Concept of Urban Food Production from a Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Hebinck, Aniek & Selomane, Odirilwe & Veen, Esther & de Vrieze, Anke & Hasnain, Saher & Sellberg, My & Sovová, Lucie & Thompson, Kyle & Vervoort, Joost & Wood, Amanda, 2020. "Exploring the transformative potential of urban food: a future research agenda," SocArXiv 4k6dh, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10256-:d:458871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.