IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10107-d455702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Starting a Participative Approach to Develop Local Green Infrastructure; from Boundary Concept to Collective Action

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmien Smets

    (Research Group for Urban Development, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Geert De Blust

    (Research Group for Urban Development, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
    Team Landscape Ecology and Nature Management, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wim Verheyden

    (Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Saskia Wanner

    (Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Maarten Van Acker

    (Research Group for Urban Development, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Francis Turkelboom

    (Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

Flanders (Belgium) is one of the most densely populated regions in Europe. Intensive land use, widespread suburbanization, inadequate environmental qualities, and fragmentation everywhere deteriorate living conditions and put pressure on species and natural habitats. In the past, several governmental initiatives were launched to establish a coherent ecological network to improve the situation. Despite the set objectives, only a little progress was made. Therefore, to establish green infrastructure, a new approach that moves away from previous top-down and one-sided strategies is developed. Making use of Green Infrastructure as a boundary concept, interpretation was given through an open and participatory process. The core is the identification of common objectives (ecosystem services or other objectives/services), the selection of appropriate green infrastructure elements to support the services, and the co-design of a network taking the local socio-ecological realm into account. By applying the methodology in concrete urban and rural projects, we learned that establishing strong coalitions of stakeholders, obtaining and sharing reliable knowledge of the systems are key to an effective realization of green infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmien Smets & Geert De Blust & Wim Verheyden & Saskia Wanner & Maarten Van Acker & Francis Turkelboom, 2020. "Starting a Participative Approach to Develop Local Green Infrastructure; from Boundary Concept to Collective Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10107-:d:455702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Marino, Mina & Tiitu, Maija & Lapintie, Kimmo & Viinikka, Arto & Kopperoinen, Leena, 2019. "Integrating green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning. Results from two Finnish case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 643-656.
    2. Veerle Cox & Marleen Goethals & Bruno De Meulder & Jan Schreurs & Frank Moulaert, 2014. "Beyond Design and Participation: The 'Thought for Food' Project in Flanders, Belgium," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 412-435, August.
    3. Martina Artmann & Olaf Bastian & Karsten Grunewald, 2017. "Using the Concepts of Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services to Specify Leitbilder for Compact and Green Cities—The Example of the Landscape Plan of Dresden (Germany)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Paul Opdam & Judith Westerink & Claire Vos & Barry de Vries, 2015. "The role and evolution of boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 63-78, March.
    5. Jost Wilker & Karsten Rusche & Christine Rymsa-Fitschen, 2016. "Improving Participation in Green Infrastructure Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 229-249, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolina Yacamán Ochoa & Daniel Ferrer Jiménez & Rafael Mata Olmo, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning in Metropolitan Regions to Improve the Connectivity of Agricultural Landscapes and Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2021. "Going Green and Going Dense: A Systematic Review of Compatibilities and Conflicts in Urban Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Clara García-Mayor & Pablo Martí & Manuel Castaño & Álvaro Bernabeu-Bautista, 2020. "The Unexploited Potential of Converting Rail Tracks to Greenways: The Spanish Vías Verdes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2019. "Assessment of Municipal Masterplans Aimed at Identifying and Fostering Green Infrastructure: A Study Concerning Three Towns of the Metropolitan Area of Cagliari, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Conway, Tenley M. & Khan, Aliza & Esak, Nasra, 2020. "An analysis of green infrastructure in municipal policy: Divergent meaning and terminology in the Greater Toronto Area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Adams, Clare & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Moglia, Magnus, 2023. "Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    10. Martí, Pablo & García-Mayor, Clara & Nolasco-Cirugeda, Almudena & Serrano-Estrada, Leticia, 2020. "Green infrastructure planning: Unveiling meaningful spaces through Foursquare users’ preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. John R. Taylor & Mamatha Hanumappa & Lara Miller & Brendan Shane & Matthew L. Richardson, 2021. "Facilitating Multifunctional Green Infrastructure Planning in Washington, DC through a Tableau Interface," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Greg D. Simpson & Jackie Parker, 2018. "Data on Peer-Reviewed Papers about Green Infrastructure, Urban Nature, and City Liveability," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, November.
    14. Le Bivic, Camille & Melot, Romain, 2020. "Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Roberto Falanga & Jessica Verheij & Olivia Bina, 2021. "Green(er) Cities and Their Citizens: Insights from the Participatory Budget of Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Burné van Zyl & E. Juaneé Cilliers & Louis G. Lategan & Sarel S. Cilliers, 2021. "Closing the Gap Between Urban Planning and Urban Ecology: A South African Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 122-134.
    17. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Hanson, Helena I. & Wickenberg, Björn & Alkan Olsson, Johanna, 2020. "Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Kampelmann, Stephan & Van Hollebeke, Sarah & Vandergert, Paula, 2016. "Stuck in the middle with you: The role of bridging organisations in urban regeneration," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 82-93.
    20. Linrun Qiu & Yuxiang Dong & Hai Liu, 2022. "Integrating Ecosystem Services into Planning Practice: Situation, Challenges and Inspirations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10107-:d:455702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.